Once again the governments own statistics prove children are at a risk of 8.4 times higher of dying when placed into foster care.
In 2014, 79 children died in NSW. 11 of those children were in out of home care. [1] This means that 7 % of the children who died were removed from parents [alive] and were protected to death by the department [FACS].
There were 1,400,000 children under the age of 15 years in NSW in 2014, [2] leaving a total of 1,373,576 children not in OOHC. And of those children, 68 died. There were 26,424 in out of home care NSW in 2014. [3] And of those children [in care] 11 of them died.
This means that:
The rate of children dying in foster care is 1 child death per 2,402 children.
And the rate of children dying not in foster care is 1 child death per 20,199 children.
Written by Lu Jiang, Pan Wang, Ying-Jian Sun & Yi-Jun Wu - Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 38, Article number: 265 (2019)
Background
Discovery and development of novel drugs that are capable of overcoming drug resistance in tumor cells are urgently needed clinically. In this study, we sought to explore whether ivermectin (IVM), a macrolide antiparasitic agent, could overcome the resistance of cancer cells to the therapeutic drugs.
Methods
We used two solid tumor cell lines (HCT-8 colorectal cancer cells and MCF-7 breast cancer cells) and one hematologic tumor cell line (K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells), which are resistant to the chemotherapeutic drugs vincristine and adriamycin respectively, and two xenograft mice models, including the solid tumor model in nude mice with the resistant HCT-8 cells and the leukemia model in NOD/SCID mice with the resistant K562 cells to investigate the reversal effect of IVM on the resistance in vitro and in vivo. MTT assay was used to investigate the effect of IVM on cancer cells growth in vitro. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence were performed to investigate the reversal effect of IVM in vivo. Western blotting, qPCR, luciferase reporter assay and ChIP assay were used to detect the molecular mechanism of the reversal effect. Octet RED96 system and Co-IP were used to determine the interactions between IVM and EGFR.
Results
Our results indicated that ivermectin at its very low dose, which did not induce obvious cytotoxicity, drastically reversed the resistance of the tumor cells to the chemotherapeutic drugs both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, ivermectin reversed the resistance mainly by reducing the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) via inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), not by directly inhibiting P-gp activity. Ivermectin bound with the extracellular domain of EGFR, which inhibited the activation of EGFR and its downstream signaling cascade ERK/Akt/NF-κB. The inhibition of the transcriptional factor NF-κB led to the reduced P-gp transcription.
The creation of a chimeric SARS-like virus has scientists discussing the risks of gain-of-function research.
Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team’s efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team’s results, which were published in Nature Medicine.
The results demonstrate the ability of the SHC014 surface protein to bind and infect human cells, validating concerns that this virus—or other coronaviruses found in bat species—may be capable of making the leap to people without first evolving in an intermediate host, Nature reported. They also reignite a debate about whether that information justifies the risk of such work, known as gain-of-function research. “If the [new] virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, told Nature.
In the next few years the Australian government is going to make taxpayers pay billions and billions of dollars for a scheme which they are promoting will help almost half a million australia's with disaiblities.
What they don't mention is that practically every non-government organisation currently looking after thousands of persons with disabilities, already receives billions of dollars per year to provide these services already. The problem is that they pocket the money instead, and keep people with disabilities chemically restrained and locked up in residential facilities, that are harder to exit than Long Bay Jail.
You will be told that this is to protect the persons in the facility, but it's not. It's for the facilities to protect thier pots of gold. Persons with disabilities in residential facilities are worth a very large amount of money, and nobody wants them to go home. With people with disabilities leaving residential care, as the NDIS statements are saying, very big businesses that house these people for profit will start losing a very big amount of money. Do you think they are going to let this happen?
Written by Dr Russell Pridgeon - Family Court Hero
The answer is Australia.
It is important that Australians understand the de facto reality that has arisen in Australia, without being noticed or commented upon by anybody: incest is no longer considered to be a crime by the Child Protection authorities, the courts, or the parliaments of this country.
It is the nearest thing to an impossibility to have a child’s allegations of sexual abuse by a family member competently investigated: the authorities will make any excuse not to prosecute the offender.
The letter below was sent to a Federal MP who was reported in the media as being deeply opposed to child sexual abuse: there was no effective response: only a form letter from a secretary:
Written by Sabine Hazan, Sonya Dave, Anoja W Gunaratne, Sibasish Dolai, Robert L Clancy, Peter A McCullough, and Thomas J Borody.
Aims: Ivermectin is a safe, inexpensive and effective early COVID-19 treatment validated in 20+ random, controlled trials. Having developed combination therapies for Helicobacter pylori, the authors present a highly effective COVID-19 therapeutic combination, stemming from clinical observations. Patients & methods: In 24 COVID-19 subjects refusing hospitalization with high-risk features, hypoxia and untreated moderate to severe symptoms averaging 9 days, the authors administered this novel combination of ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc and vitamins D and C.
Results & conclusions:All subjects resolved symptoms (in 11 days on average), and oxygen saturation improved in 24 h (87.4% to 93.1%; p = 0.001). There were no hospitalizations or deaths, less than (p < 0.002 or 0.05, respectively) background-matched CDC database controls. Triple combination therapy is safe and effective even when used in outpatients with moderate to severe symptoms.
Wow. The media certainly didn't do any research before publishing this article. How disappointing. If you had the cohuna's you'd do some and then retract all the wording such as criminal syndicate - and go after the courts and the paedophiles that are running rampant particularly in Brisbane Magistrates Court building.
What a bunch of lying criminal poofters. The only people trafficking children are the federal courts, specifically Federal Magistrates like Jarrett and Coker, the criminal children’s representatives (traffickers) and the all-paedophile supporting court psychologists.
June Lynne Lacey Bill - Guardianship prisoner with Do Not Resuscitate orders against her will - killed by by guardian who placed another 100 victims on DNR orders against their will.
June was put into guardianship when her daughter (and Power of Attorney) refused to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order at the hospitalist's request. June Lynne Lacey was taken prisoner due to a petition by social services and the hospital to remove her rights.
'She was forced into a nursing home against her will and against her family's wishes. When she protested, she was drugged and forced to take a 210 mile ambulance ride to a nursing home far from her home. She was not permitted to have a phone, not allowed to use a commode (forced to use only a bed pan), not allowed outside and given only day old food.
Within less than a month, she developed pneumonia, a staph infection, septic blood, a urinary tract infection, bedsores and a fever of 102! With an extraordinary will to live and with many prayers and faith in God, June miraculously recovered, only to be put in hospice by social services. She was forced to take oxycodone, which made it hard for her to breathe and swallow, caused an irregular heartbeat, migraines and seizures and gave her intense stomach and chest pain with horrific constipation and nauseousness!
She and her family begged to get rid of the oxycodone, but hospice and social services insisted she take it and refused her medical attention when it made her so sick! Consequently, June died! No one should be forced to die against their will and their families wishes. Health Care Directives should always be upheld and those with Power of Attorney should not be cast aside.
Please support the JUNE LYNNE LACEY BILL to ensure those most vulnerable amongst us are protected and their United States Constitutional rights upheld. (For more info go to junelynnelaceyfoundation.com.) June's rights were stripped from her. She has no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Her freedoms were taken away, she was taken prisoner and received NO JUSTICE! PLEASE SPEAK OUT AGAINST THIS INJUSTICE! "-- Joyce Lacey
See the letter below written by Dr Russell Pridgeon, which explains in graphic, accurate detail WHY children in Australia remain unprotected against sexual abuse. I will be there are a few things regarding this issue that you did not know. Read and be APPALLED!!!
The Court hearing for Russell and Patrick ODea is tabled for this Friday at the Brisbane magistrates Court.
PLEASE, EVERYONE IN BRISBANE WHO CARES ABOUT PROTECTING CHILDREN, AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE AN END TO THE TERROR VISITED UPON HUNDREDS OF AUSTRALIAN KIDS, BE THERE.
6.4.4. Medical or scientific experimentation or treatment - Scope of the right
Section 10(c) prohibits ‘medical or scientific experimentation or treatment’ of a person without their ‘full, free and informed consent’.
Article 7 of the ICCPR requires that a person must not be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation ‘without his free consent’. The European Convention on Human Rights contains no equivalent of s 10(c).
Section 10(c) goes further than the ICCPR and prohibits treatment without consent as well as experimentation. Although the prohibition against medical treatment without consent is not explicit in the ICCPR, or in the European Convention on Human Rights, it has been considered under the rights relating to inhuman or degrading treatment, liberty and security (Kracke v Mental Health Review Board (2009) 29 VAR 1; [2009] VCAT 646 [548]). The ACT and New Zealand human rights legislation, like the Charter, explicitly prohibit medical treatment without consent.
Imposing a condition of bail requiring the accused to obtain medical treatment potentially engages this right (Woods v DPP (2014) 238 A Crim R 84; [2014] VSC 1 [15], [68]–[70]).
Paedophile Contact with Victim-Children in the Family Court of Australia is a very real and serious issue, and there’s a few case references to get you started at the bottom of this message.
Paedophiles access and custody to victim- children IS NOT A MYTH concocted by “Jilted Mothers” to “get even” with the fathers.
YES. Paedophile rights trump children’s rights.
The recent arrests by the Australian Federal Police surrounding the “Criminal Syndicate of Child Abductors” known as Operation Neoctic, as reported by mainstream media is nothing more than a state sanctioned witch-hunt to protect the paedophile-sympathiser judges in the Family Court of Australia.
After winning a 3-year legal battle with the NSW Medical Council, Dr William Russell Pridgeon received the happy news last Thursday (14 April 2022) that the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal) upheld his appeal and he can to return to practice anytime.
Dr Pridgeon worked as a GP for 38 years, with 17 years in Grafton, until October 2018 when his registration was suspended due to child stealing charges, now dropped as unevidenced.
The charges arose over allegations that doctor had assisted a mother to protect her twin daughters from intra-familial sexual abuse.
In an exclusive interview, Dr Pridgeon said ‘The Tribunal and the Supreme Court recognised what it called ‘extraordinary circumstances. My actions would be regarded as exactly what a doctor should do. We have an obligation to protect children from harm,” he said.
‘I believe my actions were honourable, professional’ he said.
“Protecting children is not a crime, in fact the law demands that children are protected. It is against the law not to protect a child.”
Two years ago, supporters rolled a red carpet as he entered the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court. One supporter shook his hand and said “May the force be with you Russell”.
Contrary to the untrue claims the paedophile-parent made about his former wife (the protective parent), she was an accomplished business-woman, an active community worker and a loving mother. This protective mother :
received the Prime Minister’s award for service to the community;
was a professional businesswoman who owned a multi-disciplinary paediatric allied health practice;
was recognised with a Rotary Club Paul Harris Fellowship; and,
kept her and her children’s abuse by her husband private.
There’s much more to this case, in fact the persecution of this mother is a huge slap in the face by all those involved in the recent apology to those who were beaten, raped and sodomised whilst under the care of previous governments.
So before you make judgements or are gullible enough to believe the disproven claims that many mothers make false child sexual abuse claims to obtain “an advantage” in family court, think again. There was no criminal syndicate abducting children, the criminal syndicate is the system that send children to live with their identified abuser. That this is a VERY common occurrence and that there is a tonne of case law judgements backing this up.
Aims: Ivermectin is a safe, inexpensive and effective early COVID-19 treatment validated in 20+ random, controlled trials. Having developed combination therapies for Helicobacter pylori, the authors present a highly effective COVID-19 therapeutic combination, stemming from clinical observations. Patients & methods: In 24 COVID-19 subjects refusing hospitalization with high-risk features, hypoxia and untreated moderate to severe symptoms averaging 9 days, the authors administered this novel combination of ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc and vitamins D and C. 
Paedophile Contact with Victim-Children in the Family Court of Australia is a very real and serious issue, and there’s a few case references to get you started at the bottom of this message.