The death of a child by arrogance and ignorance ....
- Details
- Category: Ex-wards and the child abuse industry
- Created: Sunday, 28 May 2017 08:27
- Written by Alecomm2
Top disability services provider Lifestyle Solutions investigated over series of deaths
- Details
- Category: Children in residential care facilities Australia
- Created: Monday, 27 March 2017 20:39
- Written by Linton Besser, Klaus Toft, Jeanavive McGregor and Alison Brandon - Four Corners
One of Australia's most high-profile providers of disability services, Lifestyle Solutions, is under review by both the Victorian Government and the NSW Ombudsman after a series of deaths of its clients and other alarming reports about the abuse and neglect of some disabled people in its care.
Key points:
Failings were identified after four patient deaths
In one incident, a woman who had her legs amputated was left alone overnight and had no way to seek help
Victorian Government cancelled contract with Lifestyle Solutions after complaints
The Children - Part Three
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 11:12
- Written by Alecomm2
A Case Series of 100 COVID-19 Positive Patients Treated with Combination of Ivermectin and Doxycycline
- Details
- Category: Ivermectin
- Created: Monday, 04 April 2022 11:52
- Written by See below.
Background: A definitive treatment of SARS CoV-2 is yet to arrive and the human death toll rises exponentially globally. In this health emergency, it might be useful to look into the old therapies which could be effective against the virus. In vitro research showed Ivermectin could decrease the concentration of coronavirus 4000 to 5000 folds in living lung tissue.
Aim: In this prospective study a combination of Ivermectin and Doxycycline will be evaluated therapeutically to treat COVID-19 patients. Methods: 100 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in this study with a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RT- PCR of the SERS-CoV-2 will be done at designated government hospitals. The clinical features and response to treatment were noted according to a dedicated protocol.
Results: In this study male and female were 64 and 36 respectively, the age ranged between 8 to 84 years. Retesting was done between 4 and 18 days of starting medication. All patients tested negative and their symptoms improved within 72 hours. There were no noticeable side effects.
Australian Federal Police in the business of protecting paedophiles and failure of public servant to administer duties
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Sunday, 28 October 2018 19:54
- Written by Alecomm2
Isn't it a shame that mainstream media (so-called) journalists that followed suit like a bunch of lackeys, when they all jumped on the "criminal syndicate kidnapping children" bandwagon instead of doing their own homework.
Here's a few points to mull over whilst the real story gets hidden.
- Pensioners and professionals are believed to be part of the syndicate, which allegedly used encrypted messages in order to avoid detection. "Syndicate"? Really? If the family court sent your children to live with or have unsupervised access with a paedophile, what would you do to help them? Any decent human being would help. Criminalising the good guys and covering for the real criminals is such a gutless act.
- If mainstream media weren't so pathetic, they would do the research the staff at Alecomm have and discover, that the Australian Government and Family Law Courts routinely give paedphiles and convicted sex offenders access to their child-victims.
- Pridgeon - who was arrested at his home in Grafton, New South Wales on Wednesday - is a GP and founded the Australian Antipaedophile Party.
- He allegedly used Commonwealth money to create a network of 40 people which were part of the operation.Police allege O'Dea, who was also arrested on Wednesday, was given the job of driving around Australia for days at a time to pick up women and their children.
- O'Dea - who once served in the Rhodesian army - allegedly stalked and threatened a father who eventually had his children returned to him years after they were taken.
- It is alleged Pridgeon ran a Facebook page where women would send messages asking to escape from men they claimed to be paedophiles. Surely the mainstream media is aware that one in four girls is sexually assaulted by the time they are sixteen. The figures aren't much different for boys. Given that 24% of abuse cases in the family court are allegations of sexual assault, I'd say the figures match the statistics - meaning it isn't possible that all these women are lying and or jilted. What it does mean is that everytime a magistrate calls a protective mother a liar in the federal and family courts, and given the statistics of probability, he/she is potentially sending a child to live with their rapist.
If that's not bad enough, please read this long list of family court judgements that gives children either full custody to the child-raping parent or overnight-unsupervised access.
To give you a peek into what's in there we will start with Justice Carmody, who in the case of Murphy vs Murphy, stated :
“There is no presumption or a priori rule that even gross misbehaviour such as child sexual abuse or family violence disqualifies the offending parent or puts up an insurmountable barrier in the way of having contact with a child victim”.
He also either ignorantly, incompetely or deliberately stated : "
“There is no presumption or a priori rule that even gross misbehaviour such as child sexual abuse or family violence disqualifies the offending parent or puts up an insurmountable barrier in the way of having contact with a child victim”.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FamCA/2007/795.html?query=%2272%20Australian%20Law%20Journal%20434%22
The Children - Part Two
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 11:20
- Written by Dr Russell Pridgeon - Family Court Hero
It would be normal to think of people who rescue children from ongoing child sexual abuse, where there is a great cost to themselves, as decent, upstanding people, worthy of praise. In Australia, such is the official culture of tolerating child rape, those people who try to protect children from abuse are harassed, intimidated, arrested, prosecuted and jailed.
Child protectors and their organisations are being bullied, hamstrung and dismantled: only paedophiles could possibly benefit from these actions: this is a very dark moment in the history of the Australian Federal Police.
At every level, child sexual abuse is minimised, denied, covered up and the processes of law that should protect children are subverted and corrupted. Those who are paid to protect children use any excuse not to act.
The Children - Part One
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 10:59
- Written by Alecomm2
This is the first letter in a long chain of correspondence between Dr Pridgeon and the Queensland Minister of Child Safety, while he was desperately trying to rescue these children from the custody of their abusive father.
This letter has been widely cc’d to any person who may have been in a position to help these children: THEY ALL KNEW BUT NOBODY DID ANYTHING.
Minister Farmer’s sole response was to block Dr Pridgeon’s emails.
A commonly heard response was: “why didn’t you just go the Police/Child Protection/the courts?”. The answer is: because they use any excuse NOT TO ACT.
Criminal lawyers will tell you, in unguarded moments, that in practical terms, incestuous child sexual abuse is no longer a crime. Considering the terrible life long consequences for the abused child, this statement seems appalling, but a moments reflection will create realisation that it is a realistic and true statement: it is a nearly impossible task to prosecute the perpetrator of incestuous sexual abuse in Australia.
Australians might ask: who brought this about?
Dr W. R. M. Pridgeon
30/5/2018
Child abducting basket case or protective mother?
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Thursday, 01 November 2018 22:51
- Written by Alecomm2
Contrary to the untrue claims the paedophile-parent made about his former wife (the protective parent), she was an accomplished business-woman, an active community worker and a loving mother. This protective mother :
- received the Prime Minister’s award for service to the community;
- was a professional businesswoman who owned a multi-disciplinary paediatric allied health practice;
- was recognised with a Rotary Club Paul Harris Fellowship; and,
- kept her and her children’s abuse by her husband private.
There’s much more to this case, in fact the persecution of this mother is a huge slap in the face by all those involved in the recent apology to those who were beaten, raped and sodomised whilst under the care of previous governments.
So before you make judgements or are gullible enough to believe the disproven claims that many mothers make false child sexual abuse claims to obtain “an advantage” in family court, think again. There was no criminal syndicate abducting children, the criminal syndicate is the system that send children to live with their identified abuser. That this is a VERY common occurrence and that there is a tonne of case law judgements backing this up.
AFP dead wrong! Statistics prove jilted mothers are not lying and caselaw proves family courts protect paedophiles
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Sunday, 28 October 2018 21:10
- Written by Alecomm2
It's a shame that mainstream medias’ (so-called) journalists followed suit like a bunch of lackeys, when they all jumped on the "criminal syndicate kidnapping children" bandwagon - instead of doing their own homework.
Though we are sick of hearing both women and men actually believing the rubbish mainstream media dribbles, it is a tad frustrating when people aren't smart enough to consider for one moment that what they're being told is a blatant lie, or refuse to budge from their perception of "it's another nasty woman getting back at her ex-husband".
Charter of Rights for Children in Out of Home Care
- Details
- Category: Rights of the Child
- Created: Friday, 09 December 2016 13:54
- Written by Administrator
Children's Charter of Rights for all Australian states / territories attached to this article. Family and Community Services NSW state : "The Charter of Rights outlines the general rights and responsibilities of every child and young person in out-of-home-care. The NSW Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 requires that these rights are supported by carers and caseworkers." BUT you will notice that none of these charters explains exactly what kids can do when they're rights are being breached ...
See also : Ten Rules for Children, How are your children's rights implemented?, "Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure", Were your children removed on an Emergency Order? and Ludicrous reasons why good and fit mothers have lost custody
Child sex abuse cases in the Family Court of Australia
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 21:45
- Written by An extract taken from the book "Child Protection" written by Professor Freda Briggs. AO
For her PhD, Dr Wendy Foote (2006) researched into what happens when mothers report child sexual abuse to Family Courts. She found that normal maternal anxiety is pathologised and mothers, not fathers, are labelled as mentally ill. Ironically, mothers who are mentally ill do not automatically lose residence of their chidren outside the Family Court.
In only 6% of litigated cases, accused fathers were banned from spending time with their children. In 38% of these cases, the ban related to child abuse/family violence and only 2% of these fathers were labelled as mentally ill. The notion that mothers concoct allegations of child sexual abuse has persisted despite (a) Australian and International research showing that children`s evidence is reliable and (b) research conducted with the cooperation of the Australian Family Court showed that false allegations are rare and, when they occur, the mothers usually had good reason to suspect that their children were being abused or were at high risk.
The Children - Part Four
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Tuesday, 20 November 2018 11:38
- Written by Alecomm2
If anybody doubts that the truth of the assertion that incestuous child sexual abuse is no longer considered to be a crime in Australia they might review the complete disregard for the torrent of correspondence by numerous persons, including Dr Pridgeon, to multiple persons who should have been able to intervene and did not do so.
It is a demonstrable fact that the AFP have deliberately lied about the children’s abuse, while protecting the abusers (and actually delivering the children to the abusive father) while intimidating, harassing, arresting and prosecuting Australians who have made it their lifes work to protect children.
Child protection advocates and organisations have been searched by large numbers of AFP, they have been hamstrung in their efforts to protect children, they are being shut down.
Children will not benefit from this: child rapists will.
6.4.4. Medical or scientific experimentation or treatment
- Details
- Category: Covid Human Rights
- Created: Tuesday, 10 May 2016 13:21
- Written by Judicial College of Victoria
- Section 10(c) prohibits ‘medical or scientific experimentation or treatment’ of a person without their ‘full, free and informed consent’.
- Article 7 of the ICCPR requires that a person must not be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation ‘without his free consent’. The European Convention on Human Rights contains no equivalent of s 10(c).
- Section 10(c) goes further than the ICCPR and prohibits treatment without consent as well as experimentation. Although the prohibition against medical treatment without consent is not explicit in the ICCPR, or in the European Convention on Human Rights, it has been considered under the rights relating to inhuman or degrading treatment, liberty and security (Kracke v Mental Health Review Board (2009) 29 VAR 1; [2009] VCAT 646 [548]). The ACT and New Zealand human rights legislation, like the Charter, explicitly prohibit medical treatment without consent.
- The meaning of the word ‘treatment’ is broad, see 6.4.3. Cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
- Imposing a condition of bail requiring the accused to obtain medical treatment potentially engages this right (Woods v DPP (2014) 238 A Crim R 84; [2014] VSC 1 [15], [68]–[70]).
More Articles ...
- Almost one in ten children in NSW residential care were sexually abused in a single year, shocking new figures reveal
- Dispelling the myth of gender bias in the family court system
- Protected to death in 2014 by the NSW Foster Care System
- Alecomm research shows middle-age women more likely to suffer from vaccine-induced myocarditis
- What's with the National Disability Insurance Scam
- AFP linked to family court paedophilia, as concerns amongst the community grow.
- Guardianship prisoner June Lynne Lacey Bill has Do Not Resuscitate orders taken out against her and her families will.
- Doctor warns how Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ will cause delayed strokes and heart attacks - ‘The worst is yet to come’
- The C-19 Vaccines have Graphene Hydroxide! Dr. Andreas Noack announced!
