Over the past decade, the global scientific community have begun to recognize the unmatched value of an extraordinary drug, ivermectin, that originates from a single microbe unearthed from soil in Japan. Work on ivermectin has seen its discoverer, Satoshi Ōmura, of Tokyo’s prestigious Kitasato Institute, receive the 2014 Gairdner Global Health Award and the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, which he shared with a collaborating partner in the discovery and development of the drug, William Campbell of Merck & Co. Incorporated. Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary.
Australian Federal Police use Operation NoEthics to conceal claims of police misconduct and intimidate a potential witness.
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Wednesday, 03 July 2019 20:44
- Written by Mishka Hudson
Mishka is a family violence advocate and potential witness in the Operation Noetics AFP investigation, where controversially, a parent and grandparent have been charged with stealing their own children.
These caregivers strongly claim that they were protecting their children from high risk family court orders, which placed these children at significant risk of harm.
Mishka alleges that the AFP are interfering with a potential witness, namely herself, involved in the AFP Operation Noetics through using Orweillian intimidatory tactics similar to those seen in the recent ABC raids. She believes that this is to hide the misconduct and gravely flawed police investigations and heavily biased wider operation which is protecting alleged perpetrators of significant child abuse.
The biased and unbalanced views of child protection by mainstream media
- Details
- Category: Child Protection
- Created: Monday, 21 August 2017 09:12
- Written by The Chairman
Can someone please explain why the Australian Newspapers to not appear to print a balanced view of child protection? All they ever print is how hard done by the caseworkers are (even when they allow a child to be harmed), yet only print how bad parents are. In fact, even the worst parents do most of the caring for the children, and caseworkers do nothing practical for the children. All they ever do is paperwork. So long as they get their paperwork done everything appears OK.
Why are parents time pressures and needs not printed ever, to ensure proper community supports for parents, but the papers are fixated on staffing levels and the daily routines of handsomely paid social workers?
Here is the SMH complaining about staffing level on behalf of social workers : Click here And here they are again complaining about the daily routine... They claim to be really busy but appear to have enough time to lobby and talk to the newspapers ... Click here. What a joke.
Protected to death in 2014 by the NSW Foster Care System
- Details
- Category: Child protection statistics
- Created: Friday, 18 November 2016 18:10
- Written by Administrator
In 2014, 79 children died in NSW. 11 of those children were in out of home care. [1] This means that 7 % of the children who died were removed from parents [alive] and were protected to death by the department [FACS].
There were 1,400,000 children under the age of 15 years in NSW in 2014, [2] leaving a total of 1,373,576 children not in OOHC. And of those children, 68 died. There were 26,424 in out of home care NSW in 2014. [3] And of those children [in care] 11 of them died.
This means that:
- The rate of children dying in foster care is 1 child death per 2,402 children.
- And the rate of children dying not in foster care is 1 child death per 20,199 children.
[1] http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2016/s4577393.htm
[2] http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/3235.0Main%20Features152014?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3235.0&issue=2014&num=&view=
[3] https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/child-abuse-and-neglect-statistics
When children must be saved from their saviours
- Details
- Category: Child Protection
- Created: Saturday, 17 June 2017 09:32
- Written by Richard Wexler
Back when cases involving missing children – many of them runaways from foster care – were making headlines in Washington, D.C., Marie Cohen rushed to try to shift responsibility from a failing foster care system. She told us to be sure to remember that a majority of missing children in the District of Columbia “are fleeing their own homes, not foster care.”
That’s a testament not to the success of foster care but rather to the immutable laws of mathematics. Despite the best efforts of those pushing endlessly for a take-the-child-and-run approach to child welfare, a majority of children still live in their own homes, so those will be the homes from which a majority of runaways run.
Newest lawyer discovered trafficking children for financial gain
- Details
- Category: Lawyers and Solicitors
- Created: Tuesday, 16 August 2016 19:54
- Written by Administrator
Hume Legal - Joanna Jarasevic - picked up another easy score, that over a few months makes ten thousand dollars cash, and cashed right in. Unfortunately this lawyer was not working for the department at the time, and had no right to deliberately tank her clients case which ultimately ended up with the kids sent to foster care till they're eighteen. The case was simple, clear cut and the biggest point on her side, was the order for removal of the kids was not only unlawful - it was maladministration at best and corruption at worst.
The cow should have had this case dismissed. Instead she did nothing in almost a month. Not one affidavit. All she did was collude with the department, and used her scare tactics saying "there's heaps of evidence". Our auditors concluded the complete opposite, and to tell her clients to "consent to establishment", was giving up the battle before it started. She had a fantastic opportunity to put some overreaching lazy caseworkers in place and on the spot, and to save other families the same fate she sentenced this family to. But that would have meant doing more work, and getting paid less money in the long run. As most legal aid lawyers state "they don't get paid enough money to do affidavits". For christ sake, how can parents defend themselves when their own solicitors roll over because it's more financially viable.
Regarding the allegations - there wasn't a thing that couldn't be explained and most of their [FACS] dribble was lies. So much, it would make your toes curl, believe me. Fucking dirty child trafficking mutts. NB: This mutt was given enough notice that her clients were now informed of what happens when u CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT. They told her No. And she lied in court and said they said yes, making docs not have to even prove one of their single reprehensible lies. They make me sick. The whole lot of them.
Charter of Rights for Children in Out of Home Care
- Details
- Category: Rights of the Child
- Created: Friday, 09 December 2016 13:54
- Written by Administrator
Children's Charter of Rights for all Australian states / territories attached to this article. Family and Community Services NSW state : "The Charter of Rights outlines the general rights and responsibilities of every child and young person in out-of-home-care. The NSW Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 requires that these rights are supported by carers and caseworkers." BUT you will notice that none of these charters explains exactly what kids can do when they're rights are being breached ...
See also : Ten Rules for Children, How are your children's rights implemented?, "Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure", Were your children removed on an Emergency Order? and Ludicrous reasons why good and fit mothers have lost custody
The AFP used terrorist legislation to detain and intimidate human rights activists
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Sunday, 07 July 2019 17:56
- Written by Alecomm2
This week the Australian Federal Police used Terrorist Legislation to detain and intimidate Australian human rights advocate, Mishka Hudson. Mishka is a potential witness for the AFP’s Operation NoEthics, a state and federal, police and judiciary coverup of children being sent to live with sex offending parents via the family court.
There is no shortage of caselaw granting custody to paedophiles in family court because the mother or child dared disclose the sexual abuse, but the outting of the system has caused a ripple effect of attacks on those daring to expose the patriarchy in family courts today.
The AFP are using every possible opportunity to intimidate witnesses including myself in an effort to silence the truth.
Taxpayers should know that the AFP involved in this matter point blank refused to investigate the mountain of evidence supporting the children’s disclosures of sexual abuse and remain adamant they will charge and jail anyone who stands up against child sexual abuse by proxy of the federal courts.
Almost one in ten children in NSW residential care were sexually abused in a single year, shocking new figures reveal
- Details
- Category: Children abused in residential care facilities
- Created: Sunday, 13 March 2016 15:29
- Written by Taylor Auerbach - The Daily Telegraph
SOCIAL services departments are failing in their duty to care for our most vulnerable children, as shocking new figures show almost one in 10 kids in residential care homes in NSW were sexually abused in a single year.
The horrific statistic follows revelations by The Daily Telegraph last week that 41-year-old Coffs Harbour carer Dennis Kelly was facing charges of raping a 13-year-old girl living at a care home on the NSW north coast. Children living in residential care centres are among the most vulnerable in the community because they are deemed too unstable to be housed with a family.
And although they make up less than five per cent of all out-of-home-care children — the rest live with foster parents or relatives — they account for a third of all claims of sexual abuse against foster children made to the royal commission into child abuse.
Is your child in OOHC ten years old? They can legally apply to come home.
- Details
- Category: Legislation and Acts
- Created: Sunday, 23 October 2016 01:27
- Written by Alecomm2
Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 No 157 - S51 Duty of Secretary to give information to certain persons
(1) If a child or young person is in the care responsibility of the Secretary under this Part or a warrant issued under section 233, the Secretary:(a) must, as soon as practicable, cause notice of the fact that the child or young person is in the care responsibility of the Secretary, and the fact that an application may be made to the Secretary for the discharge of the child or young person from the care responsibility of the Secretary and the procedures for making such an application, to be given to:(i) in the case of a child who is of or above the age of 10 years or a young person—the child or young person, and
Child sex abuse cases in the Family Court of Australia
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 21:45
- Written by An extract taken from the book "Child Protection" written by Professor Freda Briggs. AO
For her PhD, Dr Wendy Foote (2006) researched into what happens when mothers report child sexual abuse to Family Courts. She found that normal maternal anxiety is pathologised and mothers, not fathers, are labelled as mentally ill. Ironically, mothers who are mentally ill do not automatically lose residence of their chidren outside the Family Court.
In only 6% of litigated cases, accused fathers were banned from spending time with their children. In 38% of these cases, the ban related to child abuse/family violence and only 2% of these fathers were labelled as mentally ill. The notion that mothers concoct allegations of child sexual abuse has persisted despite (a) Australian and International research showing that children`s evidence is reliable and (b) research conducted with the cooperation of the Australian Family Court showed that false allegations are rare and, when they occur, the mothers usually had good reason to suspect that their children were being abused or were at high risk.
Stalking charge dropped against NSW doctor William Pridgeon
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Friday, 30 August 2019 22:56
- Written by Kay Dibben - Courier Mail
A NSW doctor who is charged over his alleged role in an underground child stealing conspiracy will no longer face a stalking charge.
Grafton doctor William Russell Massingham Pridgeon, founder of an anti-paedophile party, is alleged to have been the main financial backer behind the alleged abduction ring.
The network is accused of assisting mothers who snatched their children and claimed they were being sexually abused by their fathers. Police say the allegations were baseless.
More Articles ...
- What developments have there been in Operation NoEthics?
- Major Bust: Heroes helping mothers arrested in sting operation
- What's with the National Disability Insurance Scam
- Not all Heroes wear Capes - Exposing Operation NoEthics
- Guardianship prisoner June Lynne Lacey Bill has Do Not Resuscitate orders taken out against her and her families will.
- Ivermectin reverses the drug resistance in cancer cells through EGFR/ERK/Akt/NF-κB pathway
- Paedophile access and custody to victim-children is not a myth concocted by [jilted] mothers
- What country in the world condones rape of a child age two?
- Family Law Think Tank on Serene Teffaha from Advocate Me
Country/IP Block
Country: United States
