Alecomm demands voting suffrage for a better Australia

Image result for voting suffrage jokeIf our voting systems were not corrupted as they have been and in violation of our constitution, then we would have the power to NOT vote any of these treasonous self-serving political scumbags in, time and time again.

We are supposed to vote in senators - not parties.  When we DEMAND our constitutional voting rights, then we get to completely choose who represents us.  Until then we will continue to plummet downhill and our country’s assets will continue to be sold off by each successive government.

Running our government was never supposed to be about teams - it was about the individuals, who wanted to make things better, that we voted in, to work together for what’s best for us.  And if they did not do that, then our votes went elsewhere next time.

Something I often here is the “government” and the “coalition” ... an implication that only one party is the “government”. Well the “government” is EVERY SINGLE PERSON elected into parliament - and every single one of them are supposed to work together as our government, for the benefit of our people. Anything less is treason. And any voting system that alters votes until it gets a “majority” has transferred to a communist system.​

Here in Australia, the whole voting system is illegal, and a violation of our fundamental human rights.

The Australian Constitution firmly states the "senators" must be voted in by the people - not parties - senators.

And article 21 of the international covenant of civil and political rights states we have the right to vote and it shall be equal suffrage.

What that means is everybody is equal in voting and being elected, it's reinforced by our constitution but has been perverted by the major parties starting at least 30 years ago with the introduction of preferential voting. The idea that we vote in senators and not parties, is because if they are not doing their job properly, then the next time we vote them out. This is how a democracy works.

Currently crooked greedy politicians are running a communist system. And a communist system (or dictatorship) is where one party rules. That's what we have been living under for a very long time, the only difference being it switches between liberal and labour every so often. It is nevertheless still a dictatorship. And the Prime Minister is exactly that the "Prime" Minister - the senator who got the most votes. Not some of the idiots we've seen. [And then the Prime Minister picks the "house speaker"].

This is why our government is in such a mess - because the major parties have had a monopoly for way too long. they do what they want - which is usually not very much, and they refuse to listen and help their constituents - which is their job. If the election process functioned as it should, your local MP would get off his ass and fix things - because if he didn't, he'd be voted out.

The whole idea of ticket voting and splitting votes does nothing for democracy either. Instead it seeks to enforce the major parties certainty in elections.

It's cheating and does not reflect the will of the people. If Jack gets 5000 votes and Jill gets none, why should Jill get a seat? Why should Jack be able to manipulate the system and gives votes to Jill and place her ahead of Joe who has more votes than her? This is wrong. It is criminal and it must be rectified.

And it is in violation of our constitution, regardless of how many high court judges continue to pervert section 51XXXVI of our constitution.

The recent voting changes, it's not about giving power back to the people via preferential voting, it's about preventing minority parties getting into government to make the changes that are required.

There is no law that requires a majority power in #government. There is no such thing as one party being referred to as "the government", “the coalition” and everybody else just a political party in #parliament.

It's all the #political parties people that are in Senate that make the government. And there probably wouldn't be so many minor parties, if major parties would address the legislation or issues that the people obviously want fixed.

The correct democratic way for voting is first past the post for the first 76 #senators, it doesn't matter if they don't receive a certain quota. #Quotas were introduced to benefit the big parties, nobody else.

Senator Andrew Murray, now commissioner for institutional child sex abuse, tried to introduce a bill in 2000 to correct the Senate voting to ensure equal #suffrage.

The bill has been introduced twice and twice knocked back, because the major parties do not under any circumstances want to lose their seats - they want the monopoly - they want to streamline crappy legislation - which is what they've been doing for at least 30 years - with no oversight and no accountability.

Various political parties have taken the matter to the High Court, to challenge unsuccessfully, because High Court judges, such as Gleeson aren't interested in a democracy or our constitution.

There's a rule in family law called the "friendly parent provision". We think it's time we introduced the "friendly politician provision".


Fifty years of #Liberal and #Labour bullshit. Times up!

The people aren't revolting - yet ... But the unelected self-serving senators are. Get out of parliament - you weren't elected.

Will the current minor parties support to repeal all unconstitutional election legislation? We the people are to vote in senators, not parties. And vote quota and manipulation is downright fraud.

#WheresTheSuffrage? The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantees us 'voters suffrage' and so does our Australian Constitution.

Our forefathers would be turning over in their graves, seeing what has happened to the Australian Government

It's time to revolt. The treason has to stop. The traitors have to go.

The election of our #Senators has been corrupted. The only candidates voted for received votes #BelowTheLine - even Alecomm's candidate got 28 votes!

The #constitution does not allow voting for parties. And our civil rights guarantee us 'equal suffrage' - meaning our ballot papers were UN constitutional & violated our civil rights.

Every elector/voter should file #Discrimination claims - based on political status, and an unconstitutional election that also violated their fundamental human rights to 'equal suffrage' when voting.

In 2014 AEC Srutineers have stated they were told to discard minor party votes. Bundaberg prevented people from voting. Other electors were told to vote both above and below the line.

One of our board members ran for senate in 2014 and we knew she had three out of town votes, yet the stats reflected only one.  People everywhere were talking about the amount of officials told to throw out votes for smaller parties, and governments show down masses of regional voting booths too.  It’s no coincidence trust me.

50 years of liberal and labour and they've done nothing for the Stolen Generations except stifle inquiries, destroy and withhold information, and spent more money protecting its reputation than doing the right thing.  The people have had enough.  Well I certainly have.

The minor parties are rubbished and made a mockery of, and the major parties push through illegal legislation in complete defiance of the will of the people.

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party wants to give #TwoVotes to businesses in Sydney elections against the people. WTF!

It's time for a revolution! If the senators aren't chosen by the people, how can you expect them to work for the people?  Or have you already realised that they don't?

Just shooting the breeze now, but feel free to read on if you wish ...

Uniting makes us stronger. BUT we ran stats after this election and it's not possible - with all the votes combined - to beat the major parties.

We need to go a step further - IMHO - the senate voting system is corrupted - and it needs repealing. All of it. Because it all creates advantage for major parties. After much research, I concluded that many of the governmental problems are created by one sole issue alone.

And that is, we are not voting in our senators.

Grouping gangs / parties together is creating an upper hand,  and whether or not it makes voting easier for SOME people, it does not make it better for all. This it creates an inequality and removes our guaranteed right to suffrage.

Secondly, ticking a box that sends all votes to those candidates also creates an inequality for other candidates of other parties or independents. And violates our constitutional right to voting suffrage.  It’s downright cheating.

Thirdly, distribution of votes is corruption, plain and simple.

These three measures that have been inserted our legislation, they violate both our constitution and our rights under International Civil and Political Covenants, which AUSTRALIA is obligated to abide by.

There have been cases challenging these obvious truths, however as our court systems have been corrupted also, we are currently unable to obtain justice through the high court.

We've researched a few of the challenges and the judges have quoted legislation that doesn't even relate to these cases as excuses to dismiss the appeals.  So ...

There are a few grounds, and one is discrimination (of us candidates), based on political affiliation.


  1. the major parties are placed in an entirely different section on the ballot paper,
  2. their names are in a bold black large font.

The minorities are smaller and grey which violates the legislation in two areas :

  1. Legislation states names must be in black font like government publications.
  2. Suffrage = equal. (Different fonts, colours, areas is not equal)
  3. and they are placed last behind the other major parties. This is not equal and or fair (suffrage).

NOW ...

We have a piss weak discrimination commissioner, who will most definitely dismiss each complaint.

HOWEVER when he dismisses TWO OR MORE complaints - as we know he will ... WE AUTOMATICALLY HAVE GROUNDS FOR A CLASS ACTION.

So .... What do you think ???


We also have the right for another discrimination complaint ... as electors/voters - for the exact same grounds as above, but from the voters point of view, based on political status also.

Same applies for the class action / representative proceedings.

WE HAVE TWENTY DAYS from the election to each file our complaints - and gather our responses.

We are also hoping he knows the difference between direct and indirect discrimination, because this is part of our argument.

So ... We have two class actions available ...

And another two complaints that we should be filing with the UN.

Marney Macdonald - ALECOMM. “Child protection, accountability, transparency, ethics and justice".


You must be logged in to comment due to spam issues.