"Corruption in the High court of Australia revealed"

For the first time in Australian history, corruption has been revealed in the High Court.  Australians’ direct access to review by the High Court is guaranteed by our Constitution and it is being refused.

This week Australian Deputy Prime Minister Truss asked High Court Chief Justice French to file a case against corrupt judges, some of them in the High Court itself (letter attached).

Earlier, High Court judges Keifel, Bell and Crennan each defied the Australian Constitution to refuse three applicants their right to justice under section 75 (v). This is corruption at the highest level, according to legal definition of the term.  The case has implications for all Australians, many of whom are unaware that this section in the Constitution was deliberately placed there to provide protection against corrupt Federal government officers, such as Family Court judges.

For 15 years the legal and judicial fraternity has covered up injustices and corruption in the secretive Family Court. Only the High Court has power to review the Family Court. Judges can only be sacked by Parliament.

Legally trained whistleblower Bruce Bell is on the run because of his information about corrupt officials in the Family Court who benefit from drug dealing and paedophilia.

Mr Bell said thousands of families were being affected by corrupt decisions in the Family Court, which had resulted in children being knowingly placed in the ‘care’ of abusers.

“Filing against corrupt federal public officials under s 75 (v) is a crucial Constitutional right of all Australians,” he said.

“The High Court is refusing to take action where the Constitution says it must.

“The unrelated co-applicants in this case have both had the problem of the other parent sexually abusing their sons.

“Yet three years ago when the High Court was first asked to protect these children, the case was refused filing.

“Many other parents have had the same kind of trouble in the Family Courts and been illegally denied the protection of the High Court.”

Mr Bell said suppression of vital evidence and acceptance by judges of biased material from the Bar table was commonplace and unforgivable.

Not only were children being illegally taken from the better parent, but properties also were being stolen through corrupt Court orders and sold to persons unknown.

“The worst aspect of needlessly secret courts like the Family and State Children’s Courts is that they breed corruption very fast,” he said.

For more information: contact Kevin 0437 003353 or Jenny 0402 025157


+3 #2 GuestGuest 2014-02-12 16:48
Even if one manages to file documents in the High Court - it is a poker game as to whether it gets heard. So many of the cases are just disposed of - no merits etc. When Justice Gummow was on the High Court he was known to say he had three votes out of seven in deciding what was heard.
+6 #1 What is the case regarding?Guest 2014-02-08 11:58
This is a very positive article, however there is an implied notion as to the content of the denied filing of the initial application to the High Court.

I am new to this site and this news ans I would like to know if possible what is the case that has been applied for hearing in the High Court? Who and what is the allegation/misc arriage of justice/voir dire/writ that is at the centre of this news piece?

You must be logged in to comment due to spam issues.