ALECOMM

Evidence that Mr Grange is being protected by authorities because of his employment at Attorney Generals

Abusers job or title:: Attorney-General Department Officer

Type of Corruption: Nepotism

Details: Category: Family court ordered child sexual abuse; Created: Friday, 14 November 2014 20:34; Written by T Grange

Dear Michael,

Please let us join forces to fight the corruption in the Police, DoCS and JIRT system.

Awaiting your reply.

Toni Grange

Dear Minister/ Commissioner/Sir/Madam,

I have discovered through my research that it is very highly probable and more than likely that Mr Kevin Grange is being protected and is immune from the criminal charges of physical and sexual assault upon daughter Chanel Grange because of Kevin’s employment at Attorney Generals.

I was aware that Kevin is being protected by the Police, DoCS and JIRT because of his employment and this was confirmed by many lawyers and medical professionals I consulted, but the information I now uncovered is confirmation that my intuition and other professionals opinions on the matter are true and correct.

Mr Grange’s official work title on the Linked In website is:

Dear Michael,

Please let us join forces to fight the corruption in the Police, DoCS and JIRT system.

Awaiting your reply.

i Grange

Mr Grange is working at the CIO of the Attorney General’s Department. The Chief Information Officer (CIO) of Attorney General’s Department is Dr Chris Black whose contact details are as follows:

s extremely interesting to note that both the email and website address for Dr Chris Black are AFP (Australian Federal Police) contact addresses not Attorney General’s contact addresses.

I guess this explains the reasons why Mr Grange:

1. was able to refuse all interviews with police, DoCS and JIRT as admitted by Mr Grange himself and Mr Grange’s refusal to be interviewed by these authorities even with a lawyer present;

2. absence of police, DoCS and JIRT investigation on Chanel’s disclosures of physical and sexual abuse;

3. the Woden Police and especially Queanbeyan Police refusal to accept my audio recordings of the physical abuse perpetrated by Mr Grange on daughter Chanel Grange;

4. DoCS and JIRT’s lax/absence of investigation upon Kevin Grange and closing the case irrespective of all the evidence I presented to them proving at least Mr Grange’s physical abuse upon Chanel;

5. Queanbeyan Police failing to call upon me for subsequent interviews and reporting of the physical abuse Mr Grange perpetrated upon Paris and I and especially Chanel as they promised they would and failing to take photographic evidence of Mr Grange’s violence in the home;

6. The police asking Kevin: “When is a good time for us to charge you?” as admitted by Mr Grange himself. It must be noted that Mr Grange received the ADVO at 10pm in Merimbula on the 23 December 2014; Kevin was not charged until 2 weeks later, 2 hours before his court appearance on the 6 January 2014 – (I am sorry, but I have never heard of police asking someone when it is a convenient time for them to be charged);

7. The DPP dropping Mr Grange’s 32 physical and sexual assault charges (upon Chanel) based purely on Chanel’s retraction; a retraction that was never investigated by DoCS, JIRT and the police. As stated repeatedly, Chanel has returned to her original physical and sexual abuse disclosures and there is evidence of this abuse that is being ignored by all authorities;

8. several medical professionals (counsellors, psychologists, Mental Health Unit at the Queanbeyan hospital) refusing to counsel Chanel (as instructed by JIRT) in the fear that Chanel will once again disclose the physical and sexual abuse her father did upon her; and

9. all the remaining injustices that I have been writing about since this matter commenced on the 23 December 2013; almost one year has passed and the injustices continue.

I ask that a formal and thorough investigation be launched on Mr Kevin Douglas Grange for the physical and sexual abuse he perpetrated on daughter Chanel Grange and request that a thorough psychiatric assessment be undertaken by Mr Grange.

This is an extremely serious matter of which my young daughter has been perpetrated and I am seeking that justice prevail.

I will not abandon this issue and will persist until I am heard and until a thorough investigation is launched on Kevin Grange on Chanel’s disclosures of physical and sexual abuse by her father.

We are talking about a young child who needs to be protected from any further physical and sexual abuse by her father.

Mr Grange is not in need of protection, daughter Chanel Grange is in need of protection. Why are the authorities refusing to act in the best interest of the child and look after the child and protect her from any further harm?

Awaiting your reply and action in this matter.

Kind regards,

Toni Grange, BA; BSc

Paris and Chanel Grange

: Toni Grange [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]
Sent: Monday, 10 November 2014 9:35 PM
To: ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘; ‘This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.‘
Subject: URGENT – Request for Assistance – Authorities protect a guilty man (Kevin Grange) of physical & sexual abuse upon an innocent child (Chanel Grange)
Importance: High

Toni Grange

16 Terrara Close

JERRABOMBERRA NSW 2619

Ph: 0413 219 455

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Dear Minister/ Commissioner/Sir/Madam,

I am forwarding you this letter I emailed on Friday 7 November 2014 to:

· Senator the Hon George Brandis QC, Attorney-General and Minister for the Arts; and

· Hon Michael Keenan MP, Minister for Justice

This letter has also been sent to all of the recipients in the table following my signature.

I am writing to you to request your assistance with the continued injustice my children Paris and especially Chanel Grange, myself and my Mother have experienced with the Queanbeyan Police, the Joint Investigation Response Team (JIRT) in Queanbeyan and the Family and Community Services (FaCS) in Queanbeyan, particularly the Department of Community Services (DoCS).

The letters enclosed to the Attorney General and the Minister for Justice, are only a brief high level summary of all the injustice that has occurred regarding:

1. my daughter, Chanel Grange’s claims (claims that are true and correct but are being concealed by authorities) of sexual and physical abuse by her father Kevin Douglas Grange; Chanel’s enclosed drawing at school, a card for Father’s Day 2014 stating that Kevin sexually abused Chanel;

2. the authorities enabling Mr Grange to refuse all interviews with Police, JIRT, DoCS and FaCS – how is it possible considering these are criminal charges involving a child? Why are the authorities protecting Kevin Grange and not protecting a young child?;

3. Kevin Grange never being investigated by JIRT, DoCS and FaCS and never requested Kevin to have a psychiatric assessment;

4. my daughter Chanel being removed from the home and my care by JIRT employees for almost five months (based on no legislative grounds – proof can be provided in Magistrate Bones 7 April 2014 Written Judgement; all seven reasons submitted in court by DoCS for Chanel’s removal are not within the Care and Protection Act 1998 legislation);

5. my daughter Chanel being placed into foster care and the injustice that prevailed in the “cover up” of Chanel’s physical abuse in the foster home and Chanel’s alienation and ostracising by DoCS from her own Mum (me), sister Paris and Nanna; DoCS and Chanel’s foster carer lying to Chanel saying she is being removed because I no longer wanted Chanel (Chanel’s Independent Children’s Lawyer in court submitted Chanel’s evidence of physical abuse in the foster care home);

6. the pain that my daughter Chanel endured in foster care and the pain I endured for the 5 months Chanel was taken away from me and how DoCS/JIRT prevented me from seeing and communicating with my own daughter for over a month; my daughter was not allowed to call me or see me on my Birthday or Mother’s Day, Chanel was not allowed to phone her own Mum during the entire 5 months in foster care. Do you have any idea how much pain Chanel and I endured from our separation?;

7. Police refusal to accept my evidence of audio recordings of the physical abuse perpetrated by Kevin Grange on daughter Chanel Grange (evidence contained herewith);

8. Police refusal to accept my audio recorded evidence of Mr Grange’s admission to me that DoCS requested he “lodge a bogus call against me so that DoCS can remove Paris from my care” (after they had already removed daughter Chanel from my care – evidence may be produced upon request);

9. Police not doing any “follow-up” on a subsequent interview (as promised during my interview on 23 December 2013) and not coming to the house to inspect and take photographs of Mr Grange’s violence in the house;

10. Police searching my house without any warrant and my permission on the 18 January 2014 and listening to Mr Kevin Grange and his Mother Ms Pamela Klemke’s allegations that I am “mentally ill, a drug addict and a bad Mother” and me being placed in the Mental Health Unit of the Queanbeyan hospital and being forced to defend myself against these allegations in Chanel Grange’s Care and Protection matter involving 12 courts;

11. The Police Incident Report does not accurately describe my MHU admission as it fails to note that Constable Pearce stated “considering your mental illness and drug issues”, manhandling me, pushing me against the police van and pinning my hands against the van threatening to hand cuff me, the reasons for 6 policemen and 2 ambulance persons entering my residence with all sirens blazing – my evidence of the 18 January 2014 events were documented in a letter dated 19 January 2014 to Superintendent Rodney Smith and none of these issues were addressed in Smith’s reply letter;

12. the Department of Public Prosecutions failing to interview and investigate Mr Grange’s physical and sexual abuse upon Chanel and dismissing Mr Grange’s 32 physical and sexual assault charges purely on Chanel’s retraction (Chanel has reverted to her original claims of physical and sexual abuse by her father Kevin Grange and maintains that her disclosures in the 23 December 2013 counselling session and police interview are true and accurate);

13. JIRT “closing the case” of physical abuse by Kevin Grange on Chanel Grange despite my audio recorded evidence of physical abuse and advising the Queanbeyan Police “not to accept any information/evidence from me”;

14. the DoCS and JIRT injustice against me resulting from Mr Grange’s erroneous allegations against me enabling the focus of attention to “be on me” and “no longer on Kevin and his physical and sexual assault upon Chanel”;

15. JIRT’s stonewalling of Chanel receiving the appropriate medical professional assessment and counselling so that she cannot make any further disclosures of physical and sexual claims by her father Kevin Grange (I have evidence of this as counselling institutions are rejecting counselling to Chanel);

16. Do you have any idea what is like for a Mum (me) to have the recurring memories of her ex-husband dragging Chanel through the house, locking her the in the room, listening to Chanel’s screams and cries “Help me Mummy, he is strangling me” and me banging on the door telling Kevin to stop hurting Chanel and my older daughter Paris witnessing these events? It is ridiculous that authorities insist on protecting Kevin and all the manner in which Chanel was hurt by Kevin. Only God knows what Kevin did to Chanel behind the locked door! Don’t forget, Paris, Chanel and I are all witnesses to these events;

17. All of Chanel’s behaviours since 18 months of age are indicative of physical and sexual abuse (diarised and noted in counselling sessions), so too are Kevin’s behaviours indicative of a sex offender; and

18. I have endured “nothing short of a nightmare” albeit “a time zone where I pinch myself in disbelief of all the travesty of injustices continuously occurring against Chanel and myself”.

I am tertiary educated, having completed two degrees in Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Science simultaneously at the Australian National University. I do not appreciate my ex-husband Kevin Douglas Grange continuous defamation of my character and erroneously stereotyping me as “mentally ill” to the Police, DoCS, FACS, JIRT, in the Family Court and everywhere else, especially when he knows that I retain two documented evidence; an ED Assessment Note from the Queanbeyan Hospital and a psychiatrist assessment performed by Dr Knox, as evidence proving that I am “not mentally ill” nor a “drug addict”. Kevin Grange is a man working in the Public Service for the Attorney Generals, who is knowingly breaching APS Codes of Conduct and is not being reprimanded by any authorities for his misconduct.

Furthermore, I “lost” a 17 year position in the Public Service because of the debacle in the Chanel’s Care and Protection matter and Chanel’s removal from my care which required endless amounts of absences from my work (as I self-represented in 12 courts) that were no longer tolerated by my work. My employment was extremely important and essential to me as it enabled me to work while also enabling and maintaining my ability to take care of Chanel and Paris by taking them to and picking them up from school and being with my daughters during all of the school holidays. I am very unlikely to locate employment that will enable this in the future. My children are extremely important to me and so is all the time I spend with my children.

Mr Kevin Grange is a Hawker College graduate who works as a Director at Attorney General’s and is obviously being protected from criminal charges of physical and sexual assault upon the family, especially upon daughter Chanel Grange. It is time that justice prevail and that Mr Grange be thoroughly interviewed and investigated for his physical and sexual abuse upon the family and reprimanded accordingly for the physical and sexual abuse upon Chanel Grange. I fail to understand why everyone is protecting this man especially when I possess so much evidence that Kevin Grange has indeed perpetrated physical (and as Chanel claims, sexual abuse) upon her.

It is also essential for me to note that Kevin had never worked in the school canteen at Jerrabomberra Public School until recently, no doubt attempting to prove that he is “a civil altruistic servant of the community who never errs in criminal behaviour”. Does Kevin possess a Working with Children Authority considering he is working in the school canteen and socialising with children?

I ask that you read this letter and the attachments and assist me so that justice prevails and Mr Grange is no longer protected against his perpetration of physical and sexual abuse upon daughter Chanel Grange.

I am asking you, no I am begging you for your assistance in this matter.

I hope that you will attend to this matter with urgency and reply to me in writing.

Kindest regards,

Toni Grange

And my beautiful daughter Chanel Grange:

Table representing the Authorities I have sent this email and enclosed attachments

Authority

Authority’s Email

Ministers

Hon Josh Frydenberg MP

Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister