Pedophile granted child custody
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Saturday, 13 June 2009 19:22
- Written by David Nankervis - Sunday Mail SA
A FAMILY Court judge has granted custody of four children to their father - a convicted pedophile and rapist.
The mother of the four youngsters, all aged under 15, requested custody at a recent Family Court hearing in Adelaide.
The unsuccessful application was made not long after the children's father was found guilty in the Adelaide District Court of multiple sex offences against a minor.
A transcript of the Family Court hearing shows the presiding judge was aware of the father's convictions and that he was on bail awaiting sentencing.
Townsville Police Child Sex Crimes Unit accused of protecting paedophiles and targetting those helping raped children
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Wednesday, 31 October 2018 14:32
- Written by Alecomm2
Congratulations on the Australian Federal Police for sending three innocent men and one courageous lady (Big brave police they are!), to be tried by the paedophile protecting family court judges.
By the way, great news press with the AFP’s Debbie Platz saying ‘how many issues the “stolen” children have’ - though we at Alecomm highly doubt it’s anything, compared to being raped by ur daddy - which is what these men were protecting these children from.
Unfortunately Townsville Detective Miles, heading the child sex abuse crimes unit already gave evidence about how he concealed sex crimes against children when sequestered in the current royal commission - read the transcripts.
Now he’s the state cop feeding the federal cops the lies that the children were never sexually abused by their father.
Child sex abuse cases in the Family Court of Australia
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 21:45
- Written by An extract taken from the book "Child Protection" written by Professor Freda Briggs. AO
For her PhD, Dr Wendy Foote (2006) researched into what happens when mothers report child sexual abuse to Family Courts. She found that normal maternal anxiety is pathologised and mothers, not fathers, are labelled as mentally ill. Ironically, mothers who are mentally ill do not automatically lose residence of their chidren outside the Family Court.
In only 6% of litigated cases, accused fathers were banned from spending time with their children. In 38% of these cases, the ban related to child abuse/family violence and only 2% of these fathers were labelled as mentally ill. The notion that mothers concoct allegations of child sexual abuse has persisted despite (a) Australian and International research showing that children`s evidence is reliable and (b) research conducted with the cooperation of the Australian Family Court showed that false allegations are rare and, when they occur, the mothers usually had good reason to suspect that their children were being abused or were at high risk.
Protective parents revolt against family law injustices
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Tuesday, 01 July 2014 19:29
- Written by Cassandra Loche
On June 27, 2014, protective parents drew a line in the sand and said “no” to the court-sponsored human sex trafficking of nine year old Lexi Dillon. Parents from four counties stood firm inside and outside Judge Glenn Salter’s Courtroom where they were prepared to battle a secret judicial lynching of Lexi’s protective parent Ruby Dillon.
Custody had previously been awarded to an alleged child molester who is not allowed in the United States, reportedly for national security reasons. The alleged child molester Matathep Srikureja is not an American citizen but rather a Pakistani whose only citizenship is in Thailand. He reportedly has a history of meeting with Jihadist groups in secret, and it is suspected that this and Lexi’s credible claims that he molested her are the reasons the U.S. Government will not allow Srikureja in the country.
While government officials have an apparent concern about the safety of the public, they appear to have no concern at all for the safety of an American child who says Srikureja repeatedly molested and took lots of naked pictures of her.
Children snatched by Queensland Child Safety and placed into full-time care of paedophile father
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Friday, 10 February 2012 12:49
- Written by MemKate
Re Brisbane Hearing where Four Government Departments are Protecting a Paedophile:
We had twelve decent people whose presence there, we believe, ensured that the Court conducted itself properly for the most part. The matter was adjourned for two weeks because it appears the Registry (presumably under pressure from above) had not placed the Court seal on the subpoenas issued to four key Government Departments - so-called 'Child Safety' , Police, Education and Health.
Last August the perfectly good mother involved, whose children have been taken by 'Child Safety' Department, and placed into the full-time, unsupervised 'care' of their pedophile father (we have Departmental documents confirming he is a pedophile and that he has sexually abused these children), along with a RealJustice representative, suffered an illegal incident at the Court --- For attempting to get these subpoenas issued, which of course is an absolute Right, our people were refused issuance of subpoenas, abused and assaulted by security guards and illegally imprisoned by police who just assumed that the Supreme Court of Queensland is honest (!). At Court last week we got the subpeonas formally sealed and issued and all four Departments were served with them on Monday. It seems obvious that the presence of observers at Court assured that this would happen. THANK YOU TO THOSE PEOPLE!
Now we ask again for the assistance of witnesses at Court on the 21st February when we expect fierce resistance to the enforced disclosure of massive corruption in support of paedophiles - probably by a pack of hired hand barristers trying to persuade the Court that the lies used to ruin people's lives should not be disclosed and that the cover-up should continue.
PLEASE COME! Help RealJustice enforce fairness and the disclosure of massive corruption. 10 am Supreme Court in the name of Bennett v Cork (regional manager of 'Child Safety'). For more information or to register your intention to come, contact www.realjustice.org.au. The more people that turn up for these hearings, to show the magistrate that we are not going to tolerate any more departmental corruption and protection, the better chance of preventing more corruption and chance of protecting these children.
"Girl raped after judge sends her to live at home of sex offender"
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Wednesday, 09 October 2013 23:30
- Written by Bob Unruh - Wind Publishing
Lawsuit details allegations that teachers also knew of threat Edward Clinton Lee, pleaded guilty to capital murder and sexual assault, is serving a life sentence with no chance of parole.
Charges are being considered against a Texas judge who sent a minor back into the home of a guardian who was living with a sex offender who later murdered the guardian and raped the juvenile, according to a lawsuit.
Also, three Texas teachers were indicted for failing to tell authorities about the student’s report of threats from the sex offender, the suit notes.
The consequences of the judge’s decision and the actions by the teachers were severe: The student was tied up and raped by the sex offender, who also murdered her guardian in front of the student, according to the lawsuit in Caldwell, Texas.
The Texas Center for Defense of Life late Tuesday filed the action on behalf of the juvenile, identified only with the initials S.R.L. The case seeks a court ruling that the teachers and judge “breached their duty” to the juvenile and compensation.
The defendants in the case are teachers Bliss Bednar, Vance Skidmore and Bradley Vestal as well as the Caldwell Independent School District and a retired judge, Terry Flenniken.
"Claims of coverup as Judge jails anti-abuse campaigner for one year to justify half a million pounds' cost of trial started by ex Lord Advocate Angiolini"
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 11:52
- Written by Media Articles
Anti abuse campaigner Robert Green is sentenced to ONE YEAR in jail for handing out leaflets calling for abuse inquiry. IN what many legal observers have branded a STAGGERING decision, Sheriff Principal Edward Bowen sitting at Stonehaven Sheriff Court earlier today took the unprecedented step of jailing the well known anti-abuse campaigner Robert Green to ONE YEAR in prison, for a ‘crime’ which can be traced back to Green’s arrest in February 2010 by Grampian Police officers on orders from the Crown Office for the heinous offence of attempting to hand out leaflets calling for an inquiry into allegations of child abuse raised by downs syndrome victim Hollie Greig and her mother, Anne Greig who were forced to flee Aberdeen some years ago after Grampian Police and Scotland’s Crown Office refused to investigate allegations of child abuse by an alleged paedophile gang based in the area.
The stiff sentence issued by Sheriff Bowen, who, it is claimed, failed to declare relationships with key figures central to the case which included the now former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini DBE QC (née McPhilomy) brings to a close for now, Scotland’s most expensive ever Breach of the Peace trial which saw a record HALF A MILLION POUNDS spent on the investigation & trial of Mr Green, a case which tunnelled through the Scottish Courts system for over two years at huge cost to taxpayers.
California Family Courts Helping Pedophiles, Batterers Get Child Custody
- Details
- Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
- Created: Wednesday, 02 March 2011 14:08
- Written by Peter Jamison - SFWeekly
Karen Anderson suspected that something strange was going on between her ex-husband, Rex Anderson, and their 15-year-old daughter. Prior to the couple's separation in 1998, the girl would sometimes put on high heels and makeup, "visiting" her dad while he worked late at night in the family's basement. It was the same retreat in which he stored the dildos and artificial vaginas he used to stimulate himself sexually.
After the divorce, Rex was given primary custody of his daughter, as well as the couple's 8-year-old son. Karen says this was because he had a full-time job as a facilities engineer at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, while she was unemployed. While staying with her on weekends, her daughter would sometimes say she hated herself and wanted to die.
In 1999, Anderson, a resident of San Jose, decided to take her concerns to Santa Clara County Family Court. Like similar courts across the state, it is charged with adjudicating high-conflict divorces — managing the division of property, child support payments, and the often bitter process of establishing a plan for shared child-rearing. She urged the court to investigate whether her daughter was at risk of sexual molestation, and whether Rex's custody rights should be restricted as a result.
Family Court Judge James Stewart temporarily barred the children from seeing their father while the court looked into the abuse claims. But instead of seeking evidence as to whether molestation was taking place, he hired a Menlo Park–based psychologist, Leslie Packer, to evaluate both parents. Among Packer's tasks was to assess, in light of their psychological profiles, whether the accusations were likely to be true. After a series of interviews and personality tests, such as the Rorschach inkblot test, she delivered her opinion: Karen's fears for her daughter were unfounded.
"Karen's suspiciousness goes to the extent of paranoid thinking, particularly in regard to her husband's actions," Packer wrote in an evaluation delivered to the court. "There is a basis in her concerns with her husband's unusual sexual practices, but it appears that most of her speculations about her husband's possible sexualized attitudes toward their daughter are not based upon documented or reality-based evidence." Rex regained primary custody of his children.
Today, Rex Anderson is serving a 23-year sentence at Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga. In 2003, he pleaded no contest to 25 counts of sex crimes against his daughter, including child molestation, sexual penetration of a child with a foreign object, and use of a minor to create pornography. When she turned 18, his daughter left his care and reported years of abuse to police in El Dorado County, where they were living. (SF Weekly is withholding her name as a victim of child sexual abuse.)
