"Ex-Victoria child protection worker now menacing Queensland parents"
- Details
-
Category: Victoria DHHS
-
Created: Monday, 06 October 2014 19:36
-
Written by Alecomm2
This woman is Sarah Bebbington, she was formerly known as Sarah Streeter when she was working for DHS Victoria. This lady has been allowed to submit into affidavits uncorroborated medical statements about a mother, which in turn were used to remove her six week old baby.
Sarah Bebbington accused a mother of having cardiomyopathy, tracheitis and was repeatedly allowed to use such information in front of various Victorian magistrates over the past four years as the initial and main reason for removing the baby from the mother.
The mother did have tracheitis and epilepsy, but the medication she was on resolved the issues. Unfortunately no matter how many times this matter was brought to the attention of the courts, the lies and gross exaggerations of this woman went unpunished. Instead the mother was punished.
Gosford Hospital Midwives are Massive Promoters of Child Trafficking
- Details
-
Category: NSW DHS - FACS
-
Created: Thursday, 01 April 2010 11:46
-
Written by Alecomm
This mother had her baby stolen just minutes after this photo was taken. No prior investigation, just a hand full of false accusations, and risk of harm reports filed by low-life nursing staff (alison) at gosford hospital.
Do you know that Alison considers herself to be more qualified than this mothers doctor, as she filed risk of harm reports stating that there was a risk of harm because the mother was taking medication that her doctor had prescribed ???
She then filed another risk of harm report stating that this mother had her previous child taken by docs also. What a filthy liar you are alison midwife at gosford hospital.
Alison also filed risk of harm reports stating that this mother had had "little" if any ante-natal care. This was another lie and doctors reports from this mothers surgery and reports from both wyong and gosford hospital proved this also.
Human Services Legal Staff will now write a letter to our nameservers whinging again about this picture - they will say we can't put it up because this child was involved in proceedings - but under the legislation ANY CHILD THAT MAY BECOME SUBJECT TO CARE PROCEEDINGS may not have their photo published.
This means that no child in Australia may have their photo published because Human Services MAY take legal action in the future. Are these guys for real? This child should have never been taken and as a result never have been subject to care proceedings.
This beautiful baby was not allowed her colostrum. Was not allowed to be breastfed. Was not even allowed to be looked at or held by her own family for the first four miserable days of her life. They even stole her brand new clothes. She was denied her right as a baby to her family, a mothers bond and her breastmilk. And as far as Linda Burney stating no child is taken without prior investigation, the recording of this situation proves Linda, you are a liar.
This baby was not allowed to go home for almost 5 months of her life. There was no reason for it. There was no investigation. All there was was DOCs caseworkers and managers, and legal representatives adjourning the case further and further in order to cause as much possible harm to both mother and baby, and father and family as possible. This mother, and the babys father, and family had to pay over $40,000 to have their beautiful baby girl returned.
This mother is not alone, nor is this baby. This is an every day happening with the Department of Community Services, and their co-conspirators at various hospitals around NSW particularly Randwick, Gosford and Wyong. Tweed Heads is up there also ... they take babies from parents who haven't even had children!
CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS (CARE AND PROTECTION) ACT 1988 - Sect 253 False or misleading statements
This section is currently under construction, but is for providing information on the taking of children and their "research" methods from South Australia.
Manmeet Bhullar