Back when cases involving missing children – many of them runaways from foster care – were making headlines in Washington, D.C., Marie Cohen rushed to try to shift responsibility from a failing foster care system. She told us to be sure to remember that a majority of missing children in the District of Columbia “are fleeing their own homes, not foster care.”
That’s a testament not to the success of foster care but rather to the immutable laws of mathematics. Despite the best efforts of those pushing endlessly for a take-the-child-and-run approach to child welfare, a majority of children still live in their own homes, so those will be the homes from which a majority of runaways run.
What developments have there been in Operation NoEthics?
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Monday, 08 July 2019 21:18
-
Written by Alecomm2
Well apart from the Australian Federal Police lying and perjuring themselves in two separate court cases in the past fortnight, doctoring the transcript of a witness interview and removing detrimental statements about certain AFP officers being named as child sex abusers, probably not too much.
Patrick O’Dea, the good doctor Russell Pridgeon and others still have ankle jewellery, and aren’t allowed interstate to attend child protection conferences with other decent human beings.
There’s also huge accolades to the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions for delivering it’s biggest brief in history - around ten thousand pages of absolute rubbish that has absolutely nothing to do with the case and is merely designed to keep the judge confused with his eyes not on the ball.
Oh, they also sent our staff intimidatory letters claiming they could be a potential witness - even though all the evidence the staff members had, the AFP already have four copies of.
AND last but not least they got Border Patrol to detain out lovely Mishka Hudson at Tullamarine airport upon return from her holiday. They held her over two hours, copied her phone AGAIN, using terrorism legislation - all without a warrant.
That about covers it for now.
Newest lawyer discovered trafficking children for financial gain
- Details
-
Category: Lawyers and Solicitors
-
Created: Tuesday, 16 August 2016 19:54
-
Written by Administrator
Hume Legal - Joanna Jarasevic - picked up another easy score, that over a few months makes ten thousand dollars cash, and cashed right in. Unfortunately this lawyer was not working for the department at the time, and had no right to deliberately tank her clients case which ultimately ended up with the kids sent to foster care till they're eighteen. The case was simple, clear cut and the biggest point on her side, was the order for removal of the kids was not only unlawful - it was maladministration at best and corruption at worst.
The cow should have had this case dismissed. Instead she did nothing in almost a month. Not one affidavit. All she did was collude with the department, and used her scare tactics saying "there's heaps of evidence". Our auditors concluded the complete opposite, and to tell her clients to "consent to establishment", was giving up the battle before it started. She had a fantastic opportunity to put some overreaching lazy caseworkers in place and on the spot, and to save other families the same fate she sentenced this family to. But that would have meant doing more work, and getting paid less money in the long run. As most legal aid lawyers state "they don't get paid enough money to do affidavits". For christ sake, how can parents defend themselves when their own solicitors roll over because it's more financially viable.
Regarding the allegations - there wasn't a thing that couldn't be explained and most of their [FACS] dribble was lies. So much, it would make your toes curl, believe me. Fucking dirty child trafficking mutts. NB: This mutt was given enough notice that her clients were now informed of what happens when u CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT. They told her No. And she lied in court and said they said yes, making docs not have to even prove one of their single reprehensible lies. They make me sick. The whole lot of them.
Child sex abuse cases in the Family Court of Australia
- Details
-
Category: Family Courts protecting Paedophiles
-
Created: Wednesday, 13 April 2016 21:45
-
Written by An extract taken from the book "Child Protection" written by Professor Freda Briggs. AO
For her PhD, Dr Wendy Foote (2006) researched into what happens when mothers report child sexual abuse to Family Courts. She found that normal maternal anxiety is pathologised and mothers, not fathers, are labelled as mentally ill. Ironically, mothers who are mentally ill do not automatically lose residence of their chidren outside the Family Court.
In only 6% of litigated cases, accused fathers were banned from spending time with their children. In 38% of these cases, the ban related to child abuse/family violence and only 2% of these fathers were labelled as mentally ill. The notion that mothers concoct allegations of child sexual abuse has persisted despite (a) Australian and International research showing that children`s evidence is reliable and (b) research conducted with the cooperation of the Australian Family Court showed that false allegations are rare and, when they occur, the mothers usually had good reason to suspect that their children were being abused or were at high risk.