fbpx

Family Court Decision Making that Escalates Risk - Response to the ALRC Review of the Family Law System

The attached submission outlines numerous cases where children disclosed sexual abuse by a parent or step-parent, and the outcomes regarding custody. The findings are troubling, as they indicate a pattern where allegations of sexual abuse are frequently dismissed, and custody is often awarded to the accused parent. Here are key points from the document:

  1. Sole Custody Awarded to Alleged Abusers:

In many cases, despite children disclosing sexual abuse, sole custody was awarded to the father, often the alleged abuser. For example, in the Watson & Burton (2015) case, the children disclosed sexual abuse by the father, including anal abuse, yet the father was granted sole custody.

Similarly, in the Bilney & Brisco (2013) case, despite the mother repeatedly notifying authorities about the father's alleged sexual abuse, the court awarded sole custody to the father. The court expert labelled the mother as delusional, dismissing the abuse allegations.

  1. Dismissal of Children's Disclosures:

In several instances, judges disregarded children's disclosures of sexual abuse. For instance, in Prentice & Wilfred (2017), the judge suggested that the child's disclosures might have resulted from suggestibility rather than actual abuse, leading to the father being granted sole custody.

In the Stapleton & Hayes (2009) case, despite children detailing specific instances of abuse, including vaginal and anal penetration, the father was granted sole custody.

Evidence that Mr Grange is being protected by authorities because of his employment at Attorney Generals

Abusers job or title:: Attorney-General Department Officer
Type of Corruption: Nepotism

Dear Michael,

Please let us join forces to fight the corruption in the Police, DoCS and JIRT system.

Awaiting your reply.

Toni Grange

 Dear Minister/ Commissioner/Sir/Madam,

I have discovered through my research that it is very highly probable and more than likely that Mr Kevin Grange is being protected and is immune from the criminal charges of physical and sexual assault upon daughter Chanel Grange because of Kevin’s employment at Attorney Generals.

I was aware that Kevin is being protected by the Police, DoCS and JIRT because of his employment and this was confirmed by many lawyers and medical professionals I consulted, but the information I now uncovered is confirmation that my intuition and other professionals opinions on the matter are true and correct.

Mr Grange’s official work title on the Linked In website is:

Abuser Name or Alias:: Kevin G
Abusers Organisation:: Attorney-General
Type of Abuse:: Physical, Sexual

AFP dead wrong! Statistics prove jilted mothers not lying and caselaw proves family courts protect paedophiles

It's a shame that mainstream medias’ (so-called) journalists followed suit like a bunch of lackeys, when they all jumped on the "criminal syndicate kidnapping children" bandwagon - instead of doing their own homework.

Though we are sick of hearing both women and men actually believing the rubbish mainstream media dribbles, it is a tad frustrating when people aren't smart enough to consider for one moment that what they're being told is a blatant lie, or refuse to budge from their perception of "it's another nasty woman getting back at her ex-husband".

What is the law and penalties for child abduction and kidnapping charges in NSW?

Last week, the Australian Federal Police cracked an underground parental abduction ring following a two-year investigation into the group that allegedly helped jilted mothers to abduct and hide their own children across Australia. Three men and a woman were arrested and charged for their alleged role in the kidnapping syndicate, which organised and financed the children’s snatching with plans to even use a yacht to smuggle them to New Zealand. The network managed to evade detection for a decade.

Among those charged include William Russell Massingham Pridgeon, a 64-year-old doctor from Grafton in NSW who is reported to have founded the Australian Anti-Paedophile Party. The party ran senate candidates in the 2016 federal election.

Prime minister will apologize to institutional sex abuse victims

Family Court “Infinitely Worse”: “Small Army of Kids…Helpless to Escape”

“[E]ven while [Prime Minister Morrison apologizes], there is a small army of children who…are living with someone of whom they are terrified...[T]here are systemic failures [in Family Court] that break the chain of protection around each child, leaving them not only vulnerable to sexual abuse but also helpless to escape it.”
- Amanda Gearing, journalist and broadcaster

On Monday, October 22, 2018, six years after parliament decided to hold a Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Australia’s new prime minister, Scott Morrison, is going to make an apology to the many victims.

However, even while he is speaking, there is a small army of children who even today are living with someone of whom they are terrified.

Ten years ago, a child of seven left a phone message on my answering machine, delivering a plea so heart-breakingly desperate that it still resonates in my ears.

Mothers labelled as delusional by courts

COURTS are giving alleged sex abuser fathers custody of their children in Tasmania, a child protection expert says.

Mothers alleging such abuse are being declared mentally ill or delusional and to be the "dangerous parent", according to Professor Freda Briggs, a former Scotland Yard child protection officer who visited the Coast in September.

"Having recently spent time in Tasmania, I am concerned that no-one appears to be protecting very young children from father-child incest when there is a case pending in the Family Court or a Family Court order is in place," Prof Briggs said in a letter to Premier Lara Giddings in December.

Mothers 'labelled dangerous'