Australian children's courts magistrates using tactics similar to bull fighting when dealing with cases
- Details
- Category: Tactics caseworkers will use against you
- Created: Monday, 22 April 2013 20:53
- Written by MoKV
A devastating, cruel and callous decision by Magistrate Cain (a former intellectual property lawyer), was handed down in less than an hour after all persons involved in the childrens matter had finished giving evidence. The mother declined to be cross-examined by Victoria's Department of Human Services legal personnel, after successfully cross-examining and proving multiple lies and misinformation by the department, which was used to remove her five month old boy.
Instead the mother wrote the magistrate a letter, saying how she was fed up with the departments lies, the magistrates continual decision to ignore her evidence, including doctors evidence of her boys abuse since being in care, and the continual perjury being committed by the department and its agents.
A six month investigation, into over one hundred and fifty breaches of protocol regarding the case was given (only half finished) to the magistrate just days into the court case, with the Complex Clients Team Member, Neville Maddox, consistently backing up the departments lies, and even stating that there was evidence to substantiate the departments accusations, when there was not.
It was exactly the same for the brief order written by Magistrate Cain, when he excitedly wrote there was overwhelming evidence of abuse and that the child, who has been removed from his mother and grandmother for just over three years now, was indeed in need of protection.
Interestingly enough, even the magistrate failed to provide one shred of evidence to substantiate the bullshit order - in which he gave the mother four times per year visits with her son, after stating that it was extremely detrimental to the boy to not see his mother for over ten months. Magistrate Cain failed to mention that it was the department who had thwarted contacted and been in breach of previous orders for doing this.
How unjust is this system. We can already hear the words twenty years down the track, how the government is sooooo sorry for the forced removal, again, of our most vulnerable. How they should never have removed children on such flimsy, untested evidence, particularly when there was always evidence to backup the parents statements to prove that their child has always been cared for, and protected and not abused.
In this case, as many others, the mother was completely unrepresented. She did an absolutely fantastic job in representing herself, and in the cross examination of the child protection workers who ruthlessly, and without following any correct protocol, forcibly removed her child. She proved time and time again that her child was never in need of protection, and that child protection in Albury / Wodonga are nothing but dirty, filthy liars.
Just like normal, the magistrates ignore the evidence of the parents to blindly side with crooked and corrupt child protection workers, including Sally Twycross, Candace Edge and the rest of the Albury / Wodonga office.
For the mother and grandmother, and all persons following the case, its another shattering blow for parents worldwide, losing children to the system who profits billions of dollars per year, with no accountability and no care for the damage they are doing.
