Another example of DoCS working in the 'Worst interest of the Child'
- Details
- Category: Uncategorised
- Created: Tuesday, 08 March 2011 13:33
- Written by Carmody
Here's another example of how our Child Protection Scumbags DO NOT work in the best interest of the child.
In an ongoing childrens court matter of more than two years now, and after one party finally got their matter into the district court on the grounds that DoCS have continually lied and falsified information, it has just been stated that the party was joined illegally.
The magistrate in the district court is now stating he has now jurisdiction over the case, and it will probably have to be handed back to the childrens court again where we all know corruption runs rife, and thats why any matter needs to be out of the childrens court and into district (but preferrably supreme) before there is any form of justice and child protection.
Sydney CSC lawyers (for docs) are now stating that the applicant - who should have the children in their care
- shouldn't be part of the proceedings, and after eight days of arguing and wasting more taxpayers money, there is no move forward whatsoever.
DoCS have now supplied a gun barrister for the foster carer, yes you heard it, the foster carer, even though the foster carer is represented by Docs. What an awful disgrace this matter is, however it is not below the standards of docs and their lawyers to do stuff like this and most regularly at that.
Whats more disgraceful is that DOCS lawyers and staff knew they had all intentions of pulling this kind of extremely expensive taxpayers money stunt to try and derail the hearings as they know that the children are being abused where they are and that they should never have been taken in the first place. But No! Docs lawyers are more than happy to now bring up the matter that the party mentioned was joined illegally and has wasted yet another six months of the childrens life.
With affidavits from one of the children stating that they want to be with the applicant, and the current foster carers having been done for drugs, drink driving and the works - and the applicant having a clean record, you would think that docs would just do the right thing and bite the bullet. Nope, they have no intention of doing that because they have an unlimited WAR CHEST made up of yours and our tax payers dosh.
Private Investigators on the case have already proved the foster carer, (whom is stating the abusive husband is out of the scene - due to drugs, alcohol, drink driving and a very interesting docs file on a sexual assault of a minor), but alecomm investigators have already documented him being at their residence every night we have attended the residence to prove otherwise
The foster carer, who has just given birth to a sick child who is hospitalised quite frequently, has been assigned a barrister on what grounds we do not know. We do know, however that the children in her care spend an awful amount of time in respite and that speech therapy that should have been given has not. So what right does DoCS and this woman have to want her to be a part of the proceedings wasting more tax payers dollars when she is not capable of doing the job as it currently stands.
Shame on all you dirty docs workers, and shame on all you lowlife child trafficking barristers who choose to continually abuse the children that are in your care for the benefit of your own pocket .
PS: GO FOR THE ILLEGAL GAG ORDER ... WE DARE YOU. BECAUSE THE MORE ILLEGAL GAG ORDERS WE ARE AWARE OF - THE EASIER THE CLASS ACTION WILL BE AGAINST BOTH APPLICANTS AND JUDGES WHO SEE IT FIT TO GAG A CASE THAT HAS NOT BEEN EXPOSED.
