Why are there so many government documents "supposedly" available that are not ??? Why does the government hide this information that should be available to the public ???

Alecomm finds itClick here to view where child protection funds really go ... quite amusing how many times, when researching for alecomm and public, that items are not available, even when they say they are.  Hundreds of documents, documents that would serve to be positive to the community JUST not available, even though government purports that they are.  Also interesting is how much information under the Attorney Generals department, covering "Law Courts Limited", a government owned business for the sole purpose of income, is not available either.  It is a government business, and the government is funded by the tax payers dollars so why can we not see the financial information on this business, that just so happens to accomodate the purposes of "court procedures" in its revenue?

Are there items in there that show just how beneficial it is for the members of the board to keep court procedures going, at the expense of families and lives, just so this business can cash in a few more dollars and waste more of the governments (tax payers) dollars on actions that are completely unnecessary and against all human rights conventions of which we, australia, signed.

Changing the Legislation to Prevent Abuse by DOCs Workers is Extremely Simple

CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS (CARE AND PROTECTION) ACT 1988 - Sect 253 False or misleading statements

A person must not, in any application under this Act or the regulations or in connection with an inquiry made by the Director-General in relation to any such application:
(a) make a statement, or
(b) furnish information, that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.
Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units.

Delete : "Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units ".  Insert "Automatic penalty: 5 penalty units and 12 months imprisonment", and

GUARDIANSHIP ACT 1987 - SECT 105 False or misleading statements

A person shall not, in any application under this Act or in connection with an inquiry made by an officer in relation to any such application:
(a) make a statement, or
(b) furnish information,
that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.
Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units.

Delete "Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units". Insert "Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units and 12 months imprisonment"

DoCS NSW Blatantly Abusing Civil Rights of American Mum

An American Citizen (with children stolen by DoCS NSW)  is presently appealing to the (citizenship) tribunal as they wanted to deport her on March 9, 2011 - WITHOUT HER CHILDREN because DoCS refuse to let the children be with the mother.  The children are not allowed their (rightful) US citizenship.  The daughter is possibly being sexually abused and the son possibly has autism or adhd.

The mother chose to stay with her husband even though he commited domestic violence - due to his commitment and success in the DV and CALM programs, and due to many positive changes in their marriage, though if not for children being held prisoner in Australia, she would prefer to be home in the US with her husband, parents, brother, sister and friends.

Ruth (DIAC WORKER) wanted to know how they met and why she did not apply for permanent residency earlier. The husband and and her had met on a game called 'WOW' (over the internet).  She visited and was invited to stay for the full 3 months. By then they were in love and she was pregnant. Because of her history of having premmies and the baby causing seizures she was on bed rest and had lost her job in the US.  She was not medically allowed to fly home and could not afford the $2000+ to apply for a visa.

Families SA Articles

This section is currently under construction, but is for providing information on the taking of children and their "research" methods from South Australia.

There is also legislation that our wonderul Legislator in South Australia is trying to get passed at the moment concerning the recording of interviews between Child Protection Workers and Families.

If anybody has time would they consider drafting this legislation for other state child protection acts, as it is an extremely important requirement to ensure the integrity of data between conversation and transcript to paper.

Accessing and Amending Your DOCs File

foi3Members of the public can seek access to departmental records via an FOI request. Requests must be in writing along with a $30 application fee ($15 concession rate).

Applications to amend or notate DoCS records, for which there is no fee, can also be made to the FOI Unit.

Click here for the PDF Format Request for Information or Click here for the Word Format Request for Information


Contact details:

Freedom of Information Unit
NSW Department of Community Services
Locked Bag 4028
Ashfield NSW 2131

Phone: (02) 9716 2662

Applications can be mailed to the above address or lodged at any DoCS community services centre.

Source : http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/annual_report/documents/build_capacity.pdf

Read How "NSW State Plans" Clearly Show Evidence of Preimptive Child Trafficking Expansion Plans

Improvements to the child protection system

  • In 2007–08, 644 applicants accepted an offer of appointment to a caseworker position, leaving approximately 55 caseworkers to be recruited, to achieve a net increase of 1025 as approved under the 2002 $1.2 billion reform package. 
  • Funding for OOHC for children and young people who cannot safely live at home, has been increased. $617m has been committed over five years to develop the OOHC system. Contract negotiations and funding roll-out have commenced.
  • Expanding the Brighter Futures program to prevent the emergence and/or escalation of child protection issues. The Brighter Futures program provides tailored support for vulnerable families with young children (under 9 years). There are currently 62 DoCS Early Intervention Teams in operation.  (Ref P45+46)

Summarising these figures we can easily assume the following:

They have employed 1000 caseworkers and spending another $600+m to traffick more helpless children, vs only 62 Early Intervention Teams working to stop the trafficking.  I wonder what the end result is going to be ???

Source : http://more.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/stateplan/DPC11064%20State%20Plan%201105%20F.pdf

Still not convinced?  Read where your caseworkers hours are allocated to by viewing the pdf attached.  You will find they spend hours and hours and hours more time preparing for court proceedings then actually viewing your case and you and your children.   Now with these figures you cannot deny the underlying agenda here.

Welcome to Gosford Family and Community Services

Lindsay McVaney Plush, you certainly look very enticing, though not so sure your outfit portrays the kind of caseworker we as the public would like to have in charge of the lives of our children. This docs worker is based at Gosford and see's to it that children and their parents are never reunited, in fact her and her colleagues will use their crown solicitor and your tax payers dollars to argue away your basic human rights.  Don't you Lindsay?

Michelle England, fantastic crown solicitor, atrocious child protection solicitor, successfully argued in court a few months ago that a grandmother was not an appropriate person to be having contact with her grandson because she exercised her article 19 rights under the convention of civil and political rights to freedom of expression.  Lindsay doesn't like how people gather at AltNews and Alecomm for support in this downtrodden child trafficking system and took the rights of the boy to have regular contact with his grandmother and now gives the grandmother 3 visits of 1 hour per year.