Understanding Ivermectin for humans vs what's available for animal use. We speak to vet experts.



Ivermectin is one of the drugs being looked at as a possible treatment for Covid-19.

The product is not approved for use in humans in the country, but has recently been cleared for compassionate-use access by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (Sahpra) for the treatment of Covid-19. THAT'S A LIE.  Ivermectin began to be distributed for human-use in 1988, with operations being organized through the independent Mectizan Donation Program (MDP) established and funded by Merck.

Because human-use ivermectin is not available in South Africa, it will need to be imported – for which special authorisation will be required. THAT'S A LIE TOO. 

The form of ivermectin currently approved for use and available in the country (legally), is not for human use. THAT'S A LIE.  

This form of ivermectin has been approved for use in animals. Despite this, reports have emerged of people using the veterinary version, raising huge safety concerns.

Health24 spoke to veterinary experts about ivermectin.

Ivermectin in South Africa

Ivermectin is commonly used for internal and external parasites in animals, predominantly in livestock like sheep and cattle, according to the president of the South African Veterinary Association Dr Leon de Bruyn.  The author should have asked a doctor, not a vet.  Because any doctors in South Africa would be well versed on the multitude of uses for Ivermectin in their country which is freely supplied by Merck - it's producer.

The drug is also used in companion animals like dogs. It is an over-the-counter drug for animals and Sahpra has recently made it a schedule three drug for humans in its compassionate-use programme. So what?  You still haven't explained the difference, in fact you've stated that the ingredients in the animal for are also used in humans.

Veterinary vs human use

According to De Bruyn, ivermectin for animals is available in five forms: injectable; oral liquid; powder; pour-on; and capsules, with the injectable form by far the most common.  That's a lie also.  The most common form for animals is the paste. 

Ivermectin for humans comes in pill or tablet form – and doctors need to apply to Sahpra for a Section 21 permit to dispense it to humans.  BULLSHIT. It's given out freely to assist with malaria, onchoriosis and other parasitic infections - and there's literally hundreds of Ivermectin / Covid testing that has repeatedly proven Ivermectin to kill Covid within 2 days.

Is it safe for human consumption?

Although the inactive excipient or carrier ingredients present in ivermectin for animals are also found as additives in human drinks and food, De Bruyn stressed that the livestock products are not registered for human consumption.  So what?

"Ivermectin has been used for many years for humans [as a treatment for certain other diseases]. It is relatively safe. But we don't know exactly that if we use it so regularly to treat or prevent the Covid-19 what the long-term effects are, but also it can have quite serious effects on the brain if overdosed (sic).

"You know, people can become blind or go into a coma. So, it's very important that they consult a health professional, and that they follow the dosage instructions they receive from that health professional," Dr De Bruyn said.  So the vet says you can go blind - when in fact, it's prescribed to people who are already blind with river disease / onchoriosis - and it magically gives them their eyesight back.  This vet is no doctor and he's actually starting to sound like a real quack - just like this poor excuse for a so-called journalist.  I guess this journalist or paper is on the Bill Gates or Fauci payroll - it's pretty obvious isn't it.

Professor Vinny Naidoo is the dean of the Faculty of Veterinary Science at the University of Pretoria and an expert in veterinary pharmacology.

In a piece he wrote, Naidoo stated that there was no evidence that veterinary ivermectin worked for humans.

He also warned that the clinical trials on humans involved only a small number of patients and, therefore, people who took ivermectin needed to be observed by doctors.  Apparently Professor Naidoo needs to get out more because there' s hundreds of experiments on Ivermectin and the only ones that come back either inconclusive or need more investigating are the ones from the research centres, newspapers and universities that are also on the Bill Gates or Fauci payroll.

"While numerous clinical studies have indeed been undertaken on ivermectin and its effect on Covid-19, there have been concerns around some of the studies having had a small number of patients, that some of the doctors were not properly blinded [prevented from being exposed to information that might influence them], and that they had patients on a number of different drugs. BULLSHIT.

"This is why, when used, the patients need to be under the care of a doctor, to allow for proper patient monitoring," Naidoo wrote.

Source : https://www.news24.com/health24/medical/infectious-diseases/coronavirus/understanding-ivermectin-for-humans-vs-whats-available-for-animal-use-we-speak-to-vet-experts-20210201-2


You must be logged in to comment due to spam issues.