claws(1) When making a care application, the Director-General must furnish details to the Children’s Court of:
(a) the support and assistance provided for the safety, welfare and well-being of the child or young person, and
(b) the alternatives to a care order that were considered before the application was made and the reasons why those alternatives were rejected.
(2) The Children’s Court must not:
(a) dismiss a care application in relation to a child or young person, or
(b) discharge a child or young person who is in the care responsibility of the Director-General from that care responsibility,
by reason only that the Children’s Court is of the opinion that an appropriate alternative action that could have been taken in relation to the child or young person was not considered or taken.
(3) Subsection (2) does not prevent the Children’s Court from adjourning proceedings. (Source : http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/caypapa1998442/s63.html

Comments

#1 Mrs Shauna HicksGuest 2015-04-23 19:57
Care Plan had not been made up until 16 months after the child had been removed from his mother. A follow up meeting has not been held, even though I have contacted DHS. Nothing was agreed upon. DHS have failed to protect the child on so many levels but continue to lie and be deceitful.

You must be logged in to comment due to spam issues.