NSW lawyer struck off for producing false evidence
- Category: Lawyers and Solicitors
- Created: Friday, 09 June 2017 21:36
- Written by Paul Gregoire and Ugur Nedim - Sydney Criminal Lawyers
Talk about Talented - this man successfully represented both the Department of Community Services and their Client Victim today in Woy Woy Children's Court. Apparently both had rang to ask for his representation in court for the said case, and he accepted.
Not only that, the magistrate didn't seem to have any issues with this given that DOCs wanted an adjournment - as stated by Dennis Chapman, and the Victim Client Mother whom had just had her baby stolen by these government approved child traffickers, did not.
How is this possible with no questions by the magistrate about the behaviour of this solicitor. Given he is going to be paid by the state twice, one for each representation, and that you cannot legally represent both parties, he even had the audacity to complain, yet again, about Alecomm.
Well good on you Dennis, and good on you for giving back those files you held after dropping your last victim client on the morning of her proceedings in supreme court and stuffing her up completely.
YOU ARE A TRUE LEGEND DENNIS CHAPMAN.
Seriously! This old tyrant looks like he belongs in a bike club not on representing innocent children. John's latest stunt is to accuse mothers in children's court of writing articles for Alecomm, or at minimum, being associated with us.
Last time we checked, Alecomm is not listed on the Terrorist register, or the Criminal Gangs. Maybe this guys is getting a little feeble in his old age and mistaking his own actions for others.
After all, the definition of domestic trafficking by the Australian Federal Police fits well into this mans job description. He receives payment for removing children, or at least conspiring to remove them. (aka accomplice). He moves children to other parties who are not the lawful carer of those children and works to have them placed with other people who financially profit from having these children.
John Paul Meehan, Campbelltown (solicitor currently representing the NSW Department of Community Services in Care Proceedings), is now threatening clients that he is "applying to the court to have costs awarded against" parents of children - whom he participated in the removal of.
So now, when parents ultimately fight to the end to have their children restored - imparticular in cases where the magistrates including former President of the Children's Court (Judge Mark Marien), has continually ordered the return of the children - he (John Meehan) will threaten that "if you do not with draw your case of trying to have your stolen children returned", he will suck up to the magistrate and have them order court costs against you - even if you are in receipt of Legal Aid funding. He also tells parents that the money they owe "will be deducted from their Centrelink payments".
Are you so used to sitting on your fat arse and getting paid your legal aid dosh for doing nothing that you can't actually remember how to defend an innocent woman and child anymore??? Shame on you.
Not only that, this Dennis Chapman is absolutely refusing to hand over all the paperwork relating to the matter to the mother, and her next Supreme Court case is next week. He is sayng that he has every right to hold onto the information for seven years. What the fuck do you want that information for Dennis, apart from to screw your ex-client just that little bit more by fucking her next court case???
Alecomm's recommendations about this solicitor is stay as far away from his as possible. Even after he lets you down he will still try and interfere and ruin your life that little bit more. And for those of you who aren't sure of the in's and outs of this case, its another Department of Child Trafficking Services, I mean Community Services, punishing a child who's mother was beaten by his father. In lamens terms instead of DOCs and the police getting of their lazy arses and doing something about the perpetrator of the crimes, DOCs just re-victimise the woman and take her kids instead.
We do live in a charming world, don't we???
* Alecomm will take this notice down upon the mother receiving the documents this week. Should the documents arrive thereafter, this article will be a permanent fixture on alecomms walls of shame. Your choice Dennis and the solution is simple - hand over the file!
The public is now calling for the immediate resignation of John Paul Meehan, whom has continued to threaten and harass a mother, and accuse her of being associated with Alecomm (an organisation well-known for it's long-term charitable and benevolent assistance in helping parents and children who are being separated by spurious child protection workers and their "accomplices"). Many parents and parents turn to Alecomm for assistance after they are repeatedly screwed by the system in every sense, from the child protection workers who are allowed to repeatedly create a multitude of fictitious reasons for the removal of a child, to the down-right-cruel legal persons who purport to assist the innocent children and parents in a system so stacked against them, that its virtually impossible to believe until you have experienced it first-hand.
Hume Legal - Joanna Jarasevic - picked up another easy score, that over a few months makes ten thousand dollars cash, and cashed right in. Unfortunately this lawyer was not working for the department at the time, and had no right to deliberately tank her clients case which ultimately ended up with the kids sent to foster care till they're eighteen. The case was simple, clear cut and the biggest point on her side, was the Emergency Order for removal of the kids was not only unlawful - it was maladministration at best and corruption at worst.
The cow should have had this case dismissed. Instead she did nothing in almost a month. Not one affidavit. All she did was collude with the department, and used her scare tactics saying "there's heaps of evidence". Our auditors concluded the complete opposite, and to tell her clients to "consent to establishment", was giving up the battle before it started. She had a fantastic opportunity to put some overreaching lazy caseworkers in place and on the spot, and to save other families the same fate she sentenced this family to. But that would have meant doing more work, and getting paid less money in the long run. As most legal aid lawyers state "they don't get paid enough money to do affidavits". For christ sake, how can parents defend themselves when their own solicitors roll over because it's more financially viable.
Regarding the allegations - there wasn't a thing that couldn't be explained and most of their [FACS] dribble was lies. So much, it would make your toes curl, believe me. Fucking dirty child trafficking mutts. NB: This mutt was given enough notice that her clients were now informed of what happens when u CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT. They told her No. And she lied in court and said they said yes, making docs not have to even prove one of their single reprehensible lies. They make me sick. The whole lot of them.
Congratulations Michelle England for being today's winner on Sydney Lawyers Asshole of the Day! You have been nominated several times for the award, and after a fantastic performance in the Supreme Court last week, you have won this amazing opportunity!
First of all, we would like to tell you a little bit about our contestant Michelle. She successfully argued her matter first in the Supreme Court in Sydney before Judge Balls as the Respondent. A fantastic win, and she almost won another case also in the Supreme Court that wasn't even being argued that day! Talk about saving the tax-payers money Michelle, what a fine legal example you are.
Then [she] successfully won a case against a grandmother fighting to have contact with her grandchild in the care of the "System", after being allowed to argue that the grandmother - who is also in a wheelchair - was not a suitable person to be having contact with her grandchild because she attended a protest. Great going Michelle, you're certainly setting the style for ethical legal arguments in the NSW Courts.
Whatever you do when entering the Children's Courts - if you are applying for Legal Aid - make sure you specify that under no circumstances will you accept this poor excuse for a solicitor to represent you. You might as well go into court yourself.
CAP Support Group (Children and Parents) turned up as support for a mother who had her baby removed.
CAP has never been affiliated with ALECOMM, and to be honest, the groups work entirely different arena's - the only commonality between the organisations', is the fact that they both deal with the corruption instilled deep within Child Protection.
Officers at the Australian Legislative Ethics Commission generally deal with the administrative side of the operations of child protection (amongst other departments), and CAP is a support group that provides personal and group support for parents dealing with child protection. Whilst ALECOMM does provide a great deal of support to our clients, this is not our only activity.
Dennis Chapman, solicitor at Gosford, is at it again, harassing his former clients. This solicitor is well known for providing piss poor legal service and even stooping as low as leaving his clients without representation once they are finally able to get their matter heard in supreme court. This time he has harassed clients whilst they were walking down their own street. This man needs to be banned from an legal practise at all.
Family Law Web Guide on the net, also has a few articles on corrupt solicitors such as Dennis Chapman, and alecomm is currently investigating to just what extent this solicitor stoops.
Mr Chapman, once again, shame on you. It was only a few weeks ago that he represented both a mother and the department of community services at Woy Woy local court, obviously not acting in the best interest of the mother, and when we comlained about it, he walked into the Woy Woy Courts, yet again and the judge issued him a gag order to prevent the mother talking any further about the matter - to anybody including her own family.
A nine-year old girl, who was sexually assaulted multiple times by her father, has been given a longer jail sentence than the perpetrator himself.
Thanks to John Meehan, low-life client-menacing solicitor from Campbelltown, who does the dirty work for child protection in the area, the girl has been taken from her mother and placed into the overflowing foster-care system. John Meehan has continually blamed the mother for having her children taken by child protection, because as he states "she failed to protect the child".
Truth be known, the mother had multiple AVOs out against the father (her ex-husband), and wanted no contact between him and his daughter unless it was supervised. DoCS refused the mothers plea for help, instead forcing her to ensure that the girl had regular contact with her father - without supervision. Failure to abide by this order from child protection would result in the department removing the children. The mother was left no choice.
When the girl approached her step-father, and informed him of what events had taken place, they rang the police. Shortly thereafter, the police arrived, as did the Department of Human Services (if that's what you can really call them) to remove the children. Their reasons ... "the mother did not protect her children".
How these animals get away with such attrocious actions on a regular basis is beneath me. Does John Meehan have children himself? Does he have grandchildren? Would he blame his own daughter, if she was forced to send her child to a suspected paedophile, and his granddaughter was repeatedly sexually assaulted?
Name Of Lawyer : David Menser
Law Firm Your Lawyer Works For : FACS
Suburb Of Lawyer : Wyong
State of Lawyer : NSW
Rating Of Lawyer : not one low enough
Reason For Rating Of Lawyer : He accepted false reports from FAC case workers and did not investigate these, threatened mother and sent this threat via email to mothers solicitor. He called the grandmother a laughing joke to solicitor, which was then told to grandmother. He called grandmother a whistle blower, threatened jail if the family attended rallies or was on facebook support group for victims of FACS, he lied to support the fabricated affidavits of FACS workers, and smirked at parents and external family members when walking past.
Name Of Lawyer : Paul Grant
Law Firm Your Lawyer Works For : ICL / Legal Aid
Suburb Of Lawyer : Wyong
State of Lawyer : NSW
Rating Of Lawyer : 0
Reason For Rating Of Lawyer : made no attempt to speak in court , did not read replies to affidavits, received an extra $12,000 in grants off legal and still did nothing. Lied to grandmother and said in court that he would be satisfied that the child be returned to grandmothers care if she got mental health clearance and character refs. When she got this clearance and fifteen character refs, he then lied and said no sorry and agreed with FACS. He did not take into consideration that the child had aboriginal heritage and child was placed with non-indigenous family. He did not question why kinship care was not investigated or assessed, and did not question why there were no investigations into false malicious reports that had been made.