fbpx

Bruce Bell mysteriously dies in Perth court yesterday

In 2012, Australian Deputy Prime Minister Truss asked High Court Chief Justice French to file a case against corrupt judges, some of them in the High Court.  Three High Court judges have denied the public access to justice at the highest level, defying a Constitutional right. For at least 15 years the legal and judicial fraternity has covered up injustices and corruption in the secretive Family Court. Only the High Court has power to review the Family Court.

Legally trained whistleblower Bruce Bell was on the run because of his information about corrupt officials, who get extra money from drug dealing and paedophilia.  Mr Bell says filing against corrupt Federal public officials is a crucial Constitutional right of all Australians, yet it has never happened before against a High Court judge.  The High Court judges have previously refused legal action against corrupt Family Court judges.

Bruce Bell was on the run for years (until 2019) when he mysteriously dropped dead in a Perth tribunal court of an alleged heart attack.  Anybody that knew Bruce, knew what a wonderful man he was.  He was denied his right to work is a fully licensed solicitor/lawyer in Australia, because the legal system couldn't have anybody within speaking out of school.  George Potkonyak was another lawyer who joined to take on the corruption within child protection, only to have his license yanked the first time be spoke out of school about the dodgy children's courts in NSW.

Bruce Bell had his life threatened for many years for speaking out on behalf of children who were being sentenced to live with their rapist parent after disclosing the abuse.  He took several court cases all the way to the high court, to discover that the corruption started at the top.  Court registrars refused to allow Bruce or his client to file their motions, in complete violation of their constitutional rights.  All they wanted to was to protect the children that had disclosed being raped by a parent involved in family court proceedings.  Unfortunately the paedophilia, as we have discovered, is entrenched deep in the Australian government just as it is in the UK.

Back then, Bruce was falsely accused of assaulting one Peter Preston, the man whose children claimed on video tape that raped them repeatedly for years, and that when they spoke out, were sentenced by family court judges, to live with that paedophile.  The children also disclosed ritual abuse and murders.  All this evidence has been concealed for many years by the courts, but has now come back to haunt the courts as they went after more protective parents and friends, whom are still trying endlessly to protect the children the failed courts will not.

These men, Patrick O'Dea and Dr Russell Pridgeon - a man of three decades a well respected doctor in small town Grafton, were arrested earlier last year and accused of running an international child abduction ring, as the family court paedophile protectors closed in on the children who were safely hidden from their rapists.

Bruce Bell's mysterious heart attack comes at a time when all his evidence is being used to support the other men the government are seeking to jail for 25 years, for doing the job the government refuses to do - protect it's children.

Rest in Peace Bruce.  We are all thinking of you tonight and you will be in our prayers and thoughts for many a year.  You were as strong as they come and had the respect of anybody who knew you and or your crusade.  You were a great friend and a brilliant advocate for children.  You will be sadly missed. 

Broken System: Electing judicial bias what factors might be at play that could influence judicial power?

What factors might be at play that could influence judicial power?  If you're heading into divorce, arm yourself with this knowledge.

Judiciary-and-Civil-Jurisprudence-Aug-14th-2018.jpgImpartiality under the law portrays this idea to most people that they can expect their rights to be afforded equally and fairly before a tribunal within our judicial system—or at least take solace that upon having representation, usually in the form of an attorney, allows for a guarantor to safeguard this notion.

These ideas are the underpinnings of those civil rights and liberties we have come to cherish that are found within the confines of the United States Constitution—but often absent for many parents forced to contend with the many competing interests playing out in family law environments.

Wars of Custody

Best practice in the conduct of Care Proceedings in the NSW Children’s Court

Children’s Court of New South Wales
Community Services Division Legal Conference
Darling Harbour:

Introduction

1. This paper has been prepared for the 2013 Department of Family and Community Services (FaCS) Legal Services Care and Protection Conference on Thursday 1 August 2013.
2. Attendees at the conference will include both public and private legal practitioners representing FaCS in care proceedings in the Children's Court of New South Wales.
3. The paper is presented in four parts: the first part will address model litigant requirements, the code of conduct obligations, and case management in care proceedings. The second part will deal with alternative dispute resolution. The third part will deal with the Children's Court Clinic, and the fourth part will address the way forward for care proceedings. I have added an Appendix dealing with some recent cases of importance.

ACT to remove sex crime immunity that originated in Ancient Rome

A common law immunity against historical child sexual abuse charges is set to be revoked in Canberra, as part of a suite of greater child protection laws.

Until 1985, there was a common law presumption in the ACT that a male under 14 years was "incapable of sexual intercourse".

The clause is part of a wider bill enacting recommendations from the royal commission into institutional child sex abuse. The clause is part of a wider bill enacting recommendations from the royal commission into institutional child sex abuse.

New Queensland Child protection legislation receives assent

The Child Protection Reform Amendment Bill 2017 (the Bill) which was initially introduced into the Queensland House of Assembly on 9 August 2017, by the Hon Shannon Fentiman MP (Member for Waterford), has now received Assent [enacted as the Child Protection Reform Amendment Act 2017, Act No 44 of 2017] with the Act commencing on 10 November 2017.

Background

According to the Bill’s Summary, the objectives will be to:

  • promote positive long-term outcomes for children in the child protection system through timely decision making and decisive action towards either reunification with family or alternative long-term care;
  • promote the safe care and connection of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children with their families, communities and cultures;
  • provide a contemporary information sharing regime for the child protection and family support system, which is focused on children’s safety and well-being; and
  • support the implementation of other key reforms under the Supporting Families Changing Futures program (the reform program) and address identified legislative issues.

Judge Stephen Thackray no doubt a paedophile

Judge’s decision to have baby Gammy’s twin Pipah raised by sex offender father ‘appalling’.

Bravehearts founder Hetty Johnston has slammed a judge’s decision to let baby Pipah be raised by a convicted child sex offender.

A JUDGE’S order to have a baby girl raised by a convicted sex offender has been slammed by Australia’s leading child protection campaigner.

In a shocking decision handed down in the Family Court of Western Australia yesterday, Justice Stephen Thackray ordered the twin sister of baby Gammy, the child at the centre of an international surrogacy dispute after being left in Thailand, remain with her sex offender father.

David Farnell, the biological father of the pair, has 22 prior convictions for child sexual abuse.

The Untouchables: America's misbehaving prosecutors, and the system that protects them

"Sorry? For what?" says Thompson. The 49-year-old is lean, almost skinny. He wears jeans, a T-shirt and running shoes and sports a thin mustache and soul patch, both stippled with gray. "You tell me that. Tell me what the hell would they be sorry for. They tried to kill me. To apologize would mean they're admitting the system is broken." His voice has been gradually increasing in volume. He's nearly yelling now. "That everyone around them is broken. It's the same motherfucking system that's protecting them."

Australian Crime Code S271.6 - Aggravated offence of domestic trafficking in persons

             (1)  A person (the first person) commits an aggravated offence of domestic trafficking in persons if the first person commits the offence of domestic trafficking in persons in relation to another person (the victim) and any of the following applies:

                     (a)  the first person commits the offence intending that the victim will be exploited, either by the first person or by another, after arrival at the place to which the person has been transported;

                     (b)  the first person, in committing the offence, subjects the victim to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment;

                     (c)  the first person, in committing the offence:

$2.2m in Mafia bribes to NSW judges alleged in top-secret police reports

5fd51e9ed7338aaa599861452d4519f005f362b3.jpg

Australian Mafia: the more it changes, the more it stays the same

An Australian Mafia boss allegedly paid $2.2 million in bribes to NSW judges to get lighter jail sentences, top-secret police intelligence reports reveal.

The reports also reveal how the price of some food – including certain types of seafood in Sydney – may be more expensive due to Mafia control of the supply chain across Australia.

A joint Fairfax Media and ABC Four Corners investigation has obtained a series of confidential Australian police reports written and circulated to state agencies between 2003 and 2014.

Lawyer Pat Barry files federal suit against the State Bar - James Towery, Fox, Wagstaffe all named in Anti-Sherman suit

sherman-1890_orig.jpg

Pat Barry, an attorney. who was declared vexatious when she tried to defend her client Michele Fortinos in probate and family law cases, where fraud, domestic violence and child abuse ran rampant,  has filed a federal suit against the State Bar, for Sherman Anti Trust violations. 

Ms. Barry's suit names attorneys and judges but also appears to be the first real effort to describe to federal courts what is going on in family law cases.

Counties charged with dividing community property and protecting children have been doing anything but. Ms. Barry's suit gives a glimpse into what people are being exposed to as due process is checked at the door when divorce and probate matters are at hand.

Ms, Barry's claims of historic failures to protect the public are not fictional.  For the past three decades family court victims have failed to understand how they enter courts of equity and end up losing their children, their property, and their retirement. Parents describe horrific tales of courts using law enforcement to force their children into reunification programs with abusers. Business owners describe  incompetent lawyers , CPAs and receivers mismanaging business valuation processes and taking all the money in doing so. 

The Director-General’s obligation to disclose corrupt conduct

Under the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988, the Director-General has a responsibility to report certain forms of corrupt conduct to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC).

Corrupt conduct involves the misuse of public office, for example:

• dishonesty
• partiality (ie. bias)
• breach of trust (ie. misuse of one’s position), or
• misuse of government information where such conduct could amount to a criminal offence, a disciplinary offence or give reasonable grounds for dismissal of a staff member.

Subcategories

  • Case Law
    Article Count:
    1
  • Constitutional Issues
    Article Count:
    3
  • Judicial Corruption
    Article Count:
    35
  • Lawyers and Solicitors
    Article Count:
    16
  • Law Reform
    Article Count:
    1
  • Legal Aid
    Article Count:
    1
  • Legislation and Acts

    We intend on using almost one dozen different legislation / acts. Below are a few that we feel would have the most impact for class action causes and or entry to Australian Crime Commission help.  What we need to be able to utilise the legislations is more than one person claiming the same type of offence, and by different departments and different areas.  This can show mass conspiracies so to speak which would then be covered by the National Crime Act.

    We also plan to use Crimes (Hostages) Act 1900 as this act allows for persons being held hostage (ie our children) until we agree to submit to persons to what they ask.  This is keeping a hostage, and by DOCs taking your children and not returning them until you have signed undertakings is not only hostage taking but blackmail. 

    There is no such thing as CONsent Orders.  You cannot possibly say anybody voluntarily signs these orders when the department has their children and will not return them until the orders are signed.  These are not Consent Orders.  This is Blackmail.

    When crimes total to over 3 years imprisonment which we can make an easy jump to, they are then also available to go to the National Crimes Act.

    We also plan on using the Director General as DOCs legislation and code of conduct and ethics documentation available also shows that any crime committed against these acts MUST be reported to the director general.  And as such the director general also has an obligation to report fraud and misconduct to the Attorney General and the Australian Crimes Commission.

    We will use the evidence we have to submit to lower level figures about their staff and they are then obligated to submit the complaint (by legislation) to the director general.  If they do not do this, they are then setting themselves up for charges also.  We will know if this is done because not only will we be submitting this information / complaints this way, but we will also be submitting directly to the director general also, who ALSO is under obligation to send to the Australian Crime Commsision and the Independant Commission Against Corruption.

    So, you say ... What do you need to do now ??

    You need to gather all your documents and evidence and start splitting hairs and complaints down to division / person and complaint type using the register we are currently creating.  You also need to contact me for other complaint types that we are not aware of so that we can include this also.

    This may take some time but time is all we have and the more the better.

    Article Count:
    66
  • SLAPP - Strategic lawsuit against public participation
    Article Count:
    2