Gosford Hospital Midwives are Massive Promoters of Child Trafficking

This mother had her baby stolen just minutes after this photo was taken.  No prior investigation, just a hand full of false accusations, and risk of harm reports filed by low-life nursing staff (alison) at gosford hospital.

Do you know that Alison considers herself to be more qualified than this mothers doctor, as she filed risk of harm reports stating that there was a risk of harm because the mother was taking medication that her doctor had prescribed ???

She then filed another risk of harm report stating that this mother had her previous child taken by docs also.  What a filthy liar you are alison midwife at gosford hospital.

Alison also filed risk of harm reports stating that this mother had had "little" if any ante-natal care.   This was another lie and doctors reports from this mothers surgery and reports from both wyong and gosford hospital proved this also.

Human Services Legal Staff will now write a letter to our nameservers whinging again about this picture - they will say we can't put it up because this child was involved in proceedings - but under the legislation ANY CHILD THAT MAY BECOME SUBJECT TO CARE PROCEEDINGS may not have their photo published.

This means that no child in Australia may have their photo published because Human Services MAY take legal action in the future.  Are these guys for real?  This child should have never been taken and as a result never have been subject to care proceedings. 

This beautiful baby was not allowed her colostrum.  Was not allowed to be breastfed.  Was not even allowed to be looked at or held by her own family for the first four miserable days of her life.  They even stole her brand new clothes.  She was denied her right as a baby to her family, a mothers bond and her breastmilk.  And as far as Linda Burney stating no child is taken without prior investigation, the recording of this situation proves Linda, you are a liar. 

This baby was not allowed to go home for almost 5 months of her life.  There was no reason for it.  There was no investigation.  All there was was DOCs caseworkers and managers, and legal representatives adjourning the case further and further in order to cause as much possible harm to both mother and baby, and father and family as possible.  This mother, and the babys father, and family had to pay over $40,000 to have their beautiful baby girl returned.

This mother is not alone, nor is this baby.  This is an every day happening with the Department of Community Services, and their co-conspirators at various hospitals around NSW particularly Randwick, Gosford and Wyong.  Tweed Heads is up there also ... they take babies from parents who haven't even had children!

Chrystal Bell - Cootamundra DoCS worst caseworker finally sacked!

A big thank you for the DoCS Management who finally sacked Chrystal Bell from the Cootamundra DoCS Office.  Chrystal Bell, a young DoCS Worker, originally joined the neonazi child stealers to have her own child returned after she fell victim to the department some years ago.

Chrystal Bell had over 200 complaints about her work ethics in just a few short years, but it took this many official complaints before something was done.  What ever happened to the three warnings that government workers used to get, before they were given the boot?  This is why we call it child trafficking and not child protection, which it is supposed to be.

Changing the Legislation to Prevent Abuse by DOCs Workers is Extremely Simple

CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS (CARE AND PROTECTION) ACT 1988 - Sect 253 False or misleading statements

A person must not, in any application under this Act or the regulations or in connection with an inquiry made by the Director-General in relation to any such application:
(a) make a statement, or
(b) furnish information, that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.
Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units.

Delete : "Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units ".  Insert "Automatic penalty: 5 penalty units and 12 months imprisonment", and

GUARDIANSHIP ACT 1987 - SECT 105 False or misleading statements

A person shall not, in any application under this Act or in connection with an inquiry made by an officer in relation to any such application:
(a) make a statement, or
(b) furnish information,
that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.
Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units.

Delete "Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units". Insert "Maximum penalty: 5 penalty units and 12 months imprisonment"

Dealing With Dirty DoCS Workers Who Lie and Mislead the Court

Commencement of private prosecutions

A private individual may also initiate criminal proceedings by way of CAN. The major difference with a private prosecution is that a CAN may only issued by a Registrar. The Registrar issues a CAN by signing the notice. A Registrar will have a discretion not to issue a CAN if the Registrar is satisfied that:

(a) the notice does not disclose grounds for the proceedings, or
(b) the notice is not in the form required by or under this Act

If a Registrar refuses to sign a CAN the person wishing to commence an action may apply to the Magistrate to review the Registrar’s decision.

If a Registrar issues the CAN the Registrar will allocate a court listing date and may grant leave to immediately file the CAN. The person initiating the prosecution may then arrange for service of the CAN prior to the date of listing.
(Source : http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/local_courts/ll_localcourts.nsf/pages/lc_topic1)

DoCS NSW Blatantly Abusing Civil Rights of American Mum

An American Citizen (with children stolen by DoCS NSW)  is presently appealing to the (citizenship) tribunal as they wanted to deport her on March 9, 2011 - WITHOUT HER CHILDREN because DoCS refuse to let the children be with the mother.  The children are not allowed their (rightful) US citizenship.  The daughter is possibly being sexually abused and the son possibly has autism or adhd.

The mother chose to stay with her husband even though he commited domestic violence - due to his commitment and success in the DV and CALM programs, and due to many positive changes in their marriage, though if not for children being held prisoner in Australia, she would prefer to be home in the US with her husband, parents, brother, sister and friends.

Ruth (DIAC WORKER) wanted to know how they met and why she did not apply for permanent residency earlier. The husband and and her had met on a game called 'WOW' (over the internet).  She visited and was invited to stay for the full 3 months. By then they were in love and she was pregnant. Because of her history of having premmies and the baby causing seizures she was on bed rest and had lost her job in the US.  She was not medically allowed to fly home and could not afford the $2000+ to apply for a visa.

Welcome to Gosford Family and Community Services

Lindsay McVaney Plush, you certainly look very enticing, though not so sure your outfit portrays the kind of caseworker we as the public would like to have in charge of the lives of our children. This docs worker is based at Gosford and see's to it that children and their parents are never reunited, in fact her and her colleagues will use their crown solicitor and your tax payers dollars to argue away your basic human rights.  Don't you Lindsay?

Michelle England, fantastic crown solicitor, atrocious child protection solicitor, successfully argued in court a few months ago that a grandmother was not an appropriate person to be having contact with her grandson because she exercised her article 19 rights under the convention of civil and political rights to freedom of expression.  Lindsay doesn't like how people gather at AltNews and Alecomm for support in this downtrodden child trafficking system and took the rights of the boy to have regular contact with his grandmother and now gives the grandmother 3 visits of 1 hour per year.