Stalking charge dropped against NSW doctor William Pridgeon
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Friday, 30 August 2019 22:56
- Written by Kay Dibben - Courier Mail
A NSW doctor who is charged over his alleged role in an underground child stealing conspiracy will no longer face a stalking charge.
Grafton doctor William Russell Massingham Pridgeon, founder of an anti-paedophile party, is alleged to have been the main financial backer behind the alleged abduction ring.
The network is accused of assisting mothers who snatched their children and claimed they were being sexually abused by their fathers. Police say the allegations were baseless.
What developments have there been in Operation NoEthics?
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Monday, 08 July 2019 21:18
- Written by Alecomm2
Well apart from the Australian Federal Police lying and perjuring themselves in two separate court cases in the past fortnight, doctoring the transcript of a witness interview and removing detrimental statements about certain AFP officers being named as child sex abusers, probably not too much.
Patrick O’Dea, the good doctor Russell Pridgeon and others still have ankle jewellery, and aren’t allowed interstate to attend child protection conferences with other decent human beings.
There’s also huge accolades to the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions for delivering it’s biggest brief in history - around ten thousand pages of absolute rubbish that has absolutely nothing to do with the case and is merely designed to keep the judge confused with his eyes not on the ball.
Oh, they also sent our staff intimidatory letters claiming they could be a potential witness - even though all the evidence the staff members had, the AFP already have four copies of.
AND last but not least they got Border Patrol to detain out lovely Mishka Hudson at Tullamarine airport upon return from her holiday. They held her over two hours, copied her phone AGAIN, using terrorism legislation - all without a warrant.
That about covers it for now.
Guardianship prisoner June Lynne Lacey Bill has Do Not Resuscitate orders taken out against her and her families will.
- Details
- Category: US public guardian corruption
- Created: Sunday, 29 December 2019 07:56
- Written by Administrator
June Lynne Lacey Bill - Guardianship prisoner with Do Not Resuscitate orders against her will - killed by by guardian who placed another 100 victims on DNR orders against their will.
June was put into guardianship when her daughter (and Power of Attorney) refused to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order at the hospitalist's request. June Lynne Lacey was taken prisoner due to a petition by social services and the hospital to remove her rights.
'She was forced into a nursing home against her will and against her family's wishes. When she protested, she was drugged and forced to take a 210 mile ambulance ride to a nursing home far from her home. She was not permitted to have a phone, not allowed to use a commode (forced to use only a bed pan), not allowed outside and given only day old food.
Within less than a month, she developed pneumonia, a staph infection, septic blood, a urinary tract infection, bedsores and a fever of 102! With an extraordinary will to live and with many prayers and faith in God, June miraculously recovered, only to be put in hospice by social services. She was forced to take oxycodone, which made it hard for her to breathe and swallow, caused an irregular heartbeat, migraines and seizures and gave her intense stomach and chest pain with horrific constipation and nauseousness!
She and her family begged to get rid of the oxycodone, but hospice and social services insisted she take it and refused her medical attention when it made her so sick! Consequently, June died! No one should be forced to die against their will and their families wishes. Health Care Directives should always be upheld and those with Power of Attorney should not be cast aside.
Please support the JUNE LYNNE LACEY BILL to ensure those most vulnerable amongst us are protected and their United States Constitutional rights upheld. (For more info go to junelynnelaceyfoundation.com.) June's rights were stripped from her. She has no right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Her freedoms were taken away, she was taken prisoner and received NO JUSTICE! PLEASE SPEAK OUT AGAINST THIS INJUSTICE! "-- Joyce Lacey
Source : https://www.facebook.com/397779416964315/posts/2635788203163414/
Is your child in OOHC ten years old? They can legally apply to come home.
- Details
- Category: Legislation and Acts
- Created: Sunday, 23 October 2016 01:27
- Written by Alecomm2
Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 No 157 - S51 Duty of Secretary to give information to certain persons
(1) If a child or young person is in the care responsibility of the Secretary under this Part or a warrant issued under section 233, the Secretary:(a) must, as soon as practicable, cause notice of the fact that the child or young person is in the care responsibility of the Secretary, and the fact that an application may be made to the Secretary for the discharge of the child or young person from the care responsibility of the Secretary and the procedures for making such an application, to be given to:(i) in the case of a child who is of or above the age of 10 years or a young person—the child or young person, andIvermectin reverses the drug resistance in cancer cells through EGFR/ERK/Akt/NF-κB pathway
- Details
- Category: Ivermectin
- Created: Tuesday, 18 June 2019 18:15
- Written by Lu Jiang, Pan Wang, Ying-Jian Sun & Yi-Jun Wu - Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research volume 38, Article number: 265 (2019)
Background
Discovery and development of novel drugs that are capable of overcoming drug resistance in tumor cells are urgently needed clinically. In this study, we sought to explore whether ivermectin (IVM), a macrolide antiparasitic agent, could overcome the resistance of cancer cells to the therapeutic drugs.
Methods
We used two solid tumor cell lines (HCT-8 colorectal cancer cells and MCF-7 breast cancer cells) and one hematologic tumor cell line (K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells), which are resistant to the chemotherapeutic drugs vincristine and adriamycin respectively, and two xenograft mice models, including the solid tumor model in nude mice with the resistant HCT-8 cells and the leukemia model in NOD/SCID mice with the resistant K562 cells to investigate the reversal effect of IVM on the resistance in vitro and in vivo. MTT assay was used to investigate the effect of IVM on cancer cells growth in vitro. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence were performed to investigate the reversal effect of IVM in vivo. Western blotting, qPCR, luciferase reporter assay and ChIP assay were used to detect the molecular mechanism of the reversal effect. Octet RED96 system and Co-IP were used to determine the interactions between IVM and EGFR.
Results
Our results indicated that ivermectin at its very low dose, which did not induce obvious cytotoxicity, drastically reversed the resistance of the tumor cells to the chemotherapeutic drugs both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, ivermectin reversed the resistance mainly by reducing the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) via inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), not by directly inhibiting P-gp activity. Ivermectin bound with the extracellular domain of EGFR, which inhibited the activation of EGFR and its downstream signaling cascade ERK/Akt/NF-κB. The inhibition of the transcriptional factor NF-κB led to the reduced P-gp transcription.
Protected to death in 2014 by the NSW Foster Care System
- Details
- Category: Child protection statistics
- Created: Friday, 18 November 2016 18:10
- Written by Administrator
Once again the governments own statistics prove children are at a risk of 8.4 times higher of dying when placed into foster care.In 2014, 79 children died in NSW. 11 of those children were in out of home care. [1] This means that 7 % of the children who died were removed from parents [alive] and were protected to death by the department [FACS].
There were 1,400,000 children under the age of 15 years in NSW in 2014, [2] leaving a total of 1,373,576 children not in OOHC. And of those children, 68 died. There were 26,424 in out of home care NSW in 2014. [3] And of those children [in care] 11 of them died.
This means that:
- The rate of children dying in foster care is 1 child death per 2,402 children.
- And the rate of children dying not in foster care is 1 child death per 20,199 children.
[1] http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2016/s4577393.htm
[2] http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/3235.0Main%20Features152014?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3235.0&issue=2014&num=&view=
[3] https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/child-abuse-and-neglect-statisticsPaedophile access and custody to victim-children is not a myth concocted by [jilted] mothers
- Details
- Category: Family court petitions
- Created: Sunday, 28 October 2018 11:02
- Written by Alecomm2
Paedophile Contact with Victim-Children in the Family Court of Australia is a very real and serious issue, and there’s a few case references to get you started at the bottom of this message.
Paedophiles access and custody to victim- children IS NOT A MYTH concocted by “Jilted Mothers” to “get even” with the fathers.
YES. Paedophile rights trump children’s rights.
The recent arrests by the Australian Federal Police surrounding the “Criminal Syndicate of Child Abductors” known as Operation Neoctic, as reported by mainstream media is nothing more than a state sanctioned witch-hunt to protect the paedophile-sympathiser judges in the Family Court of Australia.
Major Bust: Heroes helping mothers arrested in sting operation
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Monday, 08 July 2019 13:38
- Written by Administrator
Judiciary Using Criminal Justice System to Punish Mothers’ Allies
Physician Faces 25 Years; Others Face Long Prison Terms Too"We do it because we cannot abide the thought of children being raped…If Australians knew about what was happening [in Family Court], they would be revolted by it. The scale is vast, the problem is huge. It is very sinister." - Dr. Russell Pridgeon, facing prison for helping mothers protect their children
SHARE this post! Since mainstream media is spreading lies and false narratives, the main way to get the truth out is through social media.
SIGN PETITION: www.change.org/p/attorney-general-christian-porter-dismiss-…
EMAIL AG Porter: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
"Operation Noetic"
Dr. Russell Pridgeon [pictured], Patrick O’Dea were arrested Thursday in “Operation Noetic”, a two-year sting instigated by family court judges to catch mothers in hiding and their supporters who helped them flee exes who were sexually abusing their children. Arthur Doubleday, 83, was indicted along with a 78 year-old woman, and police have threatened more arrests, effectively terrorizing the small community of brave and elderly citizens who help mothers protect their children when Family Court does not.Coincidental electricity power station blow-ups or planned?
- Details
- Category: Blackrock, Vanguard and Statestreet
- Created: Sunday, 17 December 2023 03:09
- Written by Administrator
Why is it that the power plants that are having critical accidents or explosions in the US are owned by Blackrock or Vanguard? Con Edison in New York and the Hawaii electricity company that allegedly caused the Maui fires were also recently acquired by other Blackrock/Vanguard companies.). Coincidence you say? Let's see what blows up next ...
Not all Heroes wear Capes - Exposing Operation NoEthics
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Friday, 13 September 2019 19:43
- Written by What Paedophile Conspiracy
There's something "strange" going on in the hidden circles within circles that have developed and become entrenched in certain echelons of society in Australia. Injustice, cruelty, corruption and extortion seem to thrive in certain mixes while feeding on the incompetence and greed that other schools of thought and obsessions with tradition have bred.
I recently posted in a group for ex Rhodesians the following:
(excerpt):"Any of you following the progress of proceedings against two fellow ex Rhodies, one a respected GP/doctor, the other a vet of the bush war and decorated for his service, who are facing 30 years if convicted of all charges, and who have been SLANDERED by the feds, labeled as "child stealers" by main stream media across the country (Aus), all because they were the only two with backbone enough to defy and breach the dangerous and inappropriate orders made in relation to the custody of twin sisters that saw these little girls suffer immeasurably, while the 13 adults (mother, grandparents, teachers, psychologists, professors, child abuse specialists and advocates, experts in the field) who they continued to disclose to were, other than one, never even interviewed, instead reprimanded and threatened with jail if they continued to report the disclosures and repeatedly witnessed physical injuries to the relevant authorities?
Not all heroes wear capes.
Blackrock, Vanguard and StateStreet investing under 10% threshold in Aussie businesses to keep under capital gains tax threshold
- Details
- Category: Blackrock, Vanguard and Statestreet
- Created: Saturday, 16 December 2023 21:27
- Written by Administrator
In discussion with Senator Gerard Rennick in in senate estimates last week, the esteemed senator discussed capital gains taxes - or more specifically, lack thereof. Australian universities do not pay capital gains (CG) taxes on Australian students but they most certainly should be paying CG on international students. Indigenous land councils - who routinely take a whopping 40% in royalties before paying the people, should definitely pay capital gains, as should foreign investors - especially the big 3. (B,V & S, where S = BV).
What's with the National Disability Insurance Scam
- Details
- Category: National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)
- Created: Wednesday, 29 May 2013 18:15
- Written by Alecomm2
In the next few years the Australian government is going to make taxpayers pay billions and billions of dollars for a scheme which they are promoting will help almost half a million australia's with disaiblities.
What they don't mention is that practically every non-government organisation currently looking after thousands of persons with disabilities, already receives billions of dollars per year to provide these services already. The problem is that they pocket the money instead, and keep people with disabilities chemically restrained and locked up in residential facilities, that are harder to exit than Long Bay Jail.
You will be told that this is to protect the persons in the facility, but it's not. It's for the facilities to protect thier pots of gold. Persons with disabilities in residential facilities are worth a very large amount of money, and nobody wants them to go home. With people with disabilities leaving residential care, as the NDIS statements are saying, very big businesses that house these people for profit will start losing a very big amount of money. Do you think they are going to let this happen?
The Supreme Court of Appeal upholds the Good Doctor
- Details
- Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
- Created: Wednesday, 20 April 2022 23:29
- Written by Alecomm2
After winning a 3-year legal battle with the NSW Medical Council, Dr William Russell Pridgeon received the happy news last Thursday (14 April 2022) that the NSW Supreme Court of Appeal) upheld his appeal and he can to return to practice anytime.
Dr Pridgeon worked as a GP for 38 years, with 17 years in Grafton, until October 2018 when his registration was suspended due to child stealing charges, now dropped as unevidenced.
The charges arose over allegations that doctor had assisted a mother to protect her twin daughters from intra-familial sexual abuse.
In an exclusive interview, Dr Pridgeon said ‘The Tribunal and the Supreme Court recognised what it called ‘extraordinary circumstances. My actions would be regarded as exactly what a doctor should do. We have an obligation to protect children from harm,” he said.
‘I believe my actions were honourable, professional’ he said.
“Protecting children is not a crime, in fact the law demands that children are protected. It is against the law not to protect a child.”
Two years ago, supporters rolled a red carpet as he entered the Brisbane Magistrates’ Court. One supporter shook his hand and said “May the force be with you Russell”.
More Articles ...
- Effectiveness of ivermectin-based multidrug therapy in severely hypoxic, ambulatory COVID-19 patients
- What country in the world condones rape of a child age two?
- 6.4.4. Medical or scientific experimentation or treatment
- Family Law Think Tank on Serene Teffaha from Advocate Me
- The Criminal Syndicate of Child Protectors
- Criminal Syndicate exposed by Patrick O’Dea and Dr Russell Pridgeon
- Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate
- Child abducting basket case or protective mother?
- Australian Federal Police in the business of protecting paedophiles and failure of public servant to administer duties