SOCIAL services departments are failing in their duty to care for our most vulnerable children, as shocking new figures show almost one in 10 kids in residential care homes in NSW were sexually abused in a single year.
The horrific statistic follows revelations by The Daily Telegraph last week that 41-year-old Coffs Harbour carer Dennis Kelly was facing charges of raping a 13-year-old girl living at a care home on the NSW north coast. Children living in residential care centres are among the most vulnerable in the community because they are deemed too unstable to be housed with a family.
And although they make up less than five per cent of all out-of-home-care children — the rest live with foster parents or relatives — they account for a third of all claims of sexual abuse against foster children made to the royal commission into child abuse.
Protected to death in 2014 by the NSW Foster Care System
- Details
-
Category: Child protection statistics
-
Created: Friday, 18 November 2016 18:10
-
Written by Administrator
Once again the governments own statistics prove children are at a risk of 8.4 times higher of dying when placed into foster care.
In 2014, 79 children died in NSW. 11 of those children were in out of home care. [1] This means that 7 % of the children who died were removed from parents [alive] and were protected to death by the department [FACS].
There were 1,400,000 children under the age of 15 years in NSW in 2014, [2] leaving a total of 1,373,576 children not in OOHC. And of those children, 68 died. There were 26,424 in out of home care NSW in 2014. [3] And of those children [in care] 11 of them died.
This means that:
- The rate of children dying in foster care is 1 child death per 2,402 children.
- And the rate of children dying not in foster care is 1 child death per 20,199 children.
[1] http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2016/s4577393.htm
[2] http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/3235.0Main%20Features152014?opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=3235.0&issue=2014&num=&view=
[3] https://aifs.gov.au/cfca/publications/child-abuse-and-neglect-statistics
Newest lawyer discovered trafficking children for financial gain
- Details
-
Category: Lawyers and Solicitors
-
Created: Tuesday, 16 August 2016 19:54
-
Written by Administrator
Hume Legal - Joanna Jarasevic - picked up another easy score, that over a few months makes ten thousand dollars cash, and cashed right in. Unfortunately this lawyer was not working for the department at the time, and had no right to deliberately tank her clients case which ultimately ended up with the kids sent to foster care till they're eighteen. The case was simple, clear cut and the biggest point on her side, was the order for removal of the kids was not only unlawful - it was maladministration at best and corruption at worst.
The cow should have had this case dismissed. Instead she did nothing in almost a month. Not one affidavit. All she did was collude with the department, and used her scare tactics saying "there's heaps of evidence". Our auditors concluded the complete opposite, and to tell her clients to "consent to establishment", was giving up the battle before it started. She had a fantastic opportunity to put some overreaching lazy caseworkers in place and on the spot, and to save other families the same fate she sentenced this family to. But that would have meant doing more work, and getting paid less money in the long run. As most legal aid lawyers state "they don't get paid enough money to do affidavits". For christ sake, how can parents defend themselves when their own solicitors roll over because it's more financially viable.
Regarding the allegations - there wasn't a thing that couldn't be explained and most of their [FACS] dribble was lies. So much, it would make your toes curl, believe me. Fucking dirty child trafficking mutts. NB: This mutt was given enough notice that her clients were now informed of what happens when u CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT. They told her No. And she lied in court and said they said yes, making docs not have to even prove one of their single reprehensible lies. They make me sick. The whole lot of them.
Major Bust: Heroes helping mothers arrested in sting operation
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Monday, 08 July 2019 13:38
-
Written by Administrator
Judiciary Using Criminal Justice System to Punish Mothers’ Allies
Physician Faces 25 Years; Others Face Long Prison Terms Too
"We do it because we cannot abide the thought of children being raped…If Australians knew about what was happening [in Family Court], they would be revolted by it. The scale is vast, the problem is huge. It is very sinister." - Dr. Russell Pridgeon, facing prison for helping mothers protect their children
SHARE this post! Since mainstream media is spreading lies and false narratives, the main way to get the truth out is through social media.
SIGN PETITION: www.change.org/p/attorney-general-christian-porter-dismiss-…
EMAIL AG Porter: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
"Operation Noetic"
Dr. Russell Pridgeon [pictured], Patrick O’Dea were arrested Thursday in “Operation Noetic”, a two-year sting instigated by family court judges to catch mothers in hiding and their supporters who helped them flee exes who were sexually abusing their children. Arthur Doubleday, 83, was indicted along with a 78 year-old woman, and police have threatened more arrests, effectively terrorizing the small community of brave and elderly citizens who help mothers protect their children when Family Court does not.
The AFP used terrorist legislation to detain and intimidate human rights activists
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Sunday, 07 July 2019 17:56
-
Written by Alecomm2
This week the Australian Federal Police used Terrorist Legislation to detain and intimidate Australian human rights advocate, Mishka Hudson. Mishka is a potential witness for the AFP’s Operation NoEthics, a state and federal, police and judiciary coverup of children being sent to live with sex offending parents via the family court.
There is no shortage of caselaw granting custody to paedophiles in family court because the mother or child dared disclose the sexual abuse, but the outting of the system has caused a ripple effect of attacks on those daring to expose the patriarchy in family courts today.
The AFP are using every possible opportunity to intimidate witnesses including myself in an effort to silence the truth.
Taxpayers should know that the AFP involved in this matter point blank refused to investigate the mountain of evidence supporting the children’s disclosures of sexual abuse and remain adamant they will charge and jail anyone who stands up against child sexual abuse by proxy of the federal courts.
Not all Heroes wear Capes - Exposing Operation NoEthics
- Details
-
Category: Australian Antipaedophile Party
-
Created: Friday, 13 September 2019 19:43
-
Written by What Paedophile Conspiracy
There's something "strange" going on in the hidden circles within circles that have developed and become entrenched in certain echelons of society in Australia. Injustice, cruelty, corruption and extortion seem to thrive in certain mixes while feeding on the incompetence and greed that other schools of thought and obsessions with tradition have bred.
I recently posted in a group for ex Rhodesians the following:
(excerpt):
"Any of you following the progress of proceedings against two fellow ex Rhodies, one a respected GP/doctor, the other a vet of the bush war and decorated for his service, who are facing 30 years if convicted of all charges, and who have been SLANDERED by the feds, labeled as "child stealers" by main stream media across the country (Aus), all because they were the only two with backbone enough to defy and breach the dangerous and inappropriate orders made in relation to the custody of twin sisters that saw these little girls suffer immeasurably, while the 13 adults (mother, grandparents, teachers, psychologists, professors, child abuse specialists and advocates, experts in the field) who they continued to disclose to were, other than one, never even interviewed, instead reprimanded and threatened with jail if they continued to report the disclosures and repeatedly witnessed physical injuries to the relevant authorities?
Not all heroes wear capes.