Paedophiles access and custody to victim- children IS NOT A MYTH concocted by “Jilted Mothers” to “get even” with the fathers.
YES. Paedophile rights trump children’s rights.
The recent arrests by the Australian Federal Police surrounding the “Criminal Syndicate of Child Abductors” known as Operation Neoctic, as reported by mainstream media is nothing more than a state sanctioned witch-hunt to protect the paedophile-sympathiser judges in the Family Court of Australia.
Best practice in the conduct of Care Proceedings in the NSW Children’s Court
Category: Law Courts and Legal Matters
Created: Thursday, 01 August 2013 23:36
Written by Judge Peter Johnstone - NSW Children’s Court
Children’s Court of New South Wales
Community Services Division Legal Conference
1. This paper has been prepared for the 2013 Department of Family and Community Services (FaCS) Legal Services Care and Protection Conference on Thursday 1 August 2013.
2. Attendees at the conference will include both public and private legal practitioners representing FaCS in care proceedings in the Children's Court of New South Wales.
3. The paper is presented in four parts: the first part will address model litigant requirements, the code of conduct obligations, and case management in care proceedings. The second part will deal with alternative dispute resolution. The third part will deal with the Children's Court Clinic, and the fourth part will address the way forward for care proceedings. I have added an Appendix dealing with some recent cases of importance.
Bruce Bell mysteriously dies in Perth court yesterday
Category: Judicial Corruption
Created: Thursday, 06 February 2014 17:54
Written by Alecomm2
In 2012, Australian Deputy Prime Minister Truss asked High Court Chief Justice French to file a case against corrupt judges, some of them in the High Court. Three High Court judges have denied the public access to justice at the highest level, defying a Constitutional right. For at least 15 years the legal and judicial fraternity has covered up injustices and corruption in the secretive Family Court. Only the High Court has power to review the Family Court.
Newest lawyer discovered trafficking children for financial gain
Category: Lawyers and Solicitors
Created: Tuesday, 16 August 2016 19:54
Written by Administrator
Hume Legal - Joanna Jarasevic - picked up another easy score, that over a few months makes ten thousand dollars cash, and cashed right in. Unfortunately this lawyer was not working for the department at the time, and had no right to deliberately tank her clients case which ultimately ended up with the kids sent to foster care till they're eighteen. The case was simple, clear cut and the biggest point on her side, was the Emergency Order for removal of the kids was not only unlawful - it was maladministration at best and corruption at worst.
The cow should have had this case dismissed. Instead she did nothing in almost a month. Not one affidavit. All she did was collude with the department, and used her scare tactics saying "there's heaps of evidence". Our auditors concluded the complete opposite, and to tell her clients to "consent to establishment", was giving up the battle before it started. She had a fantastic opportunity to put some overreaching lazy caseworkers in place and on the spot, and to save other families the same fate she sentenced this family to. But that would have meant doing more work, and getting paid less money in the long run. As most legal aid lawyers state "they don't get paid enough money to do affidavits". For christ sake, how can parents defend themselves when their own solicitors roll over because it's more financially viable.
Regarding the allegations - there wasn't a thing that couldn't be explained and most of their [FACS] dribble was lies. So much, it would make your toes curl, believe me. Fucking dirty child trafficking mutts. NB: This mutt was given enough notice that her clients were now informed of what happens when u CONSENT TO ESTABLISHMENT. They told her No. And she lied in court and said they said yes, making docs not have to even prove one of their single reprehensible lies. They make me sick. The whole lot of them.
Is your child in OOHC ten years old? They can legally apply to come home.
Category: Legislation and Acts
Created: Sunday, 23 October 2016 01:27
Written by Alecomm2
Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 No 157 - S51 Duty of Secretary to give information to certain persons
(1) If a child or young person is in the care responsibility of the Secretary under this Part or a warrant issued under section 233, the Secretary:
(a) must, as soon as practicable, cause notice of the fact that the child or young person is in the care responsibility of the Secretary, and the fact that an application may be made to the Secretary for the discharge of the child or young person from the care responsibility of the Secretary and the procedures for making such an application, to be given to:
(i) in the case of a child who is of or above the age of 10 years or a young person—the child or young person, and