Jurassic Park Syndrome

What is Jurassic Park Syndrome (JPS) ?

Jurassic Park Syndrome is where the reader of a document, no matter how ridiculous it is, is completely overwhelmed by its contents and actually starts to believe it.  You have to remember that nothing is too ridiculous for the family courts, or the children's courts for that matter, and the fact that the authorities make the common mistake of being lazy and not reading fully all information supplied contributes substantially to JPS.

When the authorities only skim through the documents that they then rely upon to make their 'informed decisions' they often find themselves lost in what is written and not how it is written or what was not.  This completely derails their ability to investigate the matter at hand and come back with a reasonable judgement.

People actually believe that they are doing the right thing when they 'jump to a conclusion' based on what evidence they have read when in actual fact if they asked a few questions and maybe listened to the people concerned when they are trying to give simple explanations for particular statements they would find they would quite often come to an entirely different  answer.

Jurassic Park Syndrome (JPS) is a form of Munchausen-by-Proxy, in that these people are fabricating events and abusing children in the process in order to gain the attention off either their supervisor or the court system and to make out that they are actually saving the child, when in actual fact all they have done is abuse the child.  This is MBP, there is no denying it, and it is just a matter of time before it will be recognised within our systems and those perpetrating the crimes upon our children whilst they are suffering JPS will be held accountable.

What Legislation Do We Intend on Using ??

We intend on using almost one dozen different legislation / acts. Below are a few that we feel would have the most impact for class action causes and or entry to Australian Crime Commission help.  What we need to be able to utilise the legislations is more than one person claiming the same type of offence, and by different departments and different areas.  This can show mass conspiracies so to speak which would then be covered by the National Crime Act.

We also plan to use Crimes (Hostages) Act 1900 as this act allows for persons being held hostage (ie our children) until we agree to submit to persons to what they ask.  This is keeping a hostage, and by DOCs taking your children and not returning them until you have signed undertakings is not only hostage taking but blackmail.

When crimes total to over 3 years imprisonment which we can make an easy jump to, they are then also available to go to the National Crimes Act.

Accessing and Amending Your DOCs File

foi3Members of the public can seek access to departmental records via an FOI request. Requests must be in writing along with a $30 application fee ($15 concession rate).

Applications to amend or notate DoCS records, for which there is no fee, can also be made to the FOI Unit.

Click here for the PDF Format Request for Information or Click here for the Word Format Request for Information

 

Contact details:

Freedom of Information Unit
NSW Department of Community Services
Locked Bag 4028
Ashfield NSW 2131

Phone: (02) 9716 2662

Applications can be mailed to the above address or lodged at any DoCS community services centre.

Source : http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/annual_report/documents/build_capacity.pdf

How Can We Fix the Child Protection System ?

Fixing the system is quite simple.  And it doesn't involve another enquiry or another research expedition wasting another few hundred million dollars.  And it certainly doesn't need more statistics.  This is where the government seems to keep getting stuck.  Publishing a document and paying somebody to research it doesn't fix it.  The legislation is quite fine so long as it is being applied equally and with natural justice.  And for those who don't abide by it, well they must get their natural justice also. 

For each and every complaint listed, there is an offence applicable for that person.  Now just as Parking Fines are administered via the SETONS system (self enforcing ticketable offence notice systems - for those of you not in Queensland), ie the car has been parked in the designated area too long therefore the officer writes up a ticket, well there should be fines and automatic sacking for those whom breach their codes of conduct, provide false and misleading information in court affidavits, omit relevant information showing clear bias to a particular party (usually the parents) etc.

Read How "NSW State Plans" Clearly Show Evidence of Preimptive Child Trafficking Expansion Plans

Improvements to the child protection system

  • In 2007–08, 644 applicants accepted an offer of appointment to a caseworker position, leaving approximately 55 caseworkers to be recruited, to achieve a net increase of 1025 as approved under the 2002 $1.2 billion reform package. 
  • Funding for OOHC for children and young people who cannot safely live at home, has been increased. $617m has been committed over five years to develop the OOHC system. Contract negotiations and funding roll-out have commenced.
  • Expanding the Brighter Futures program to prevent the emergence and/or escalation of child protection issues. The Brighter Futures program provides tailored support for vulnerable families with young children (under 9 years). There are currently 62 DoCS Early Intervention Teams in operation.  (Ref P45+46)

Summarising these figures we can easily assume the following:

They have employed 1000 caseworkers and spending another $600+m to traffick more helpless children, vs only 62 Early Intervention Teams working to stop the trafficking.  I wonder what the end result is going to be ???

Source : http://more.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/stateplan/DPC11064%20State%20Plan%201105%20F.pdf

Still not convinced?  Read where your caseworkers hours are allocated to by viewing the pdf attached.  You will find they spend hours and hours and hours more time preparing for court proceedings then actually viewing your case and you and your children.   Now with these figures you cannot deny the underlying agenda here.

Review of the Ability of Children in Out-Of-Home Care to Donate their Organs for Transplantation

In 2007-2008 Annette Gallard, Deputy Director-General led a review of the ability of children in out-of-home care to donate their organs for transplantation.  The public would like to know what this review entailed and what the outcomes and reports are of such a review, because I can tell you, this worlding scares the absolute bejeezur's off me!  I was sent this appendix, attached. 

To people associated with DOCs the words "carving up family" and "harvesting them out" have an extremely true meaning with what DOCs actually do to the children of these poor families, but until we see the associated documents that go with the abovementioned statements, we've just been given another new and horrifying one. 

I's sure theres a perfectly good explanation on this article, so where is it!  :-)

Source : http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/annual_report/documents/appendices.pdf

Welcome to Gosford Family and Community Services

Lindsay McVaney Plush, you certainly look very enticing, though not so sure your outfit portrays the kind of caseworker we as the public would like to have in charge of the lives of our children. This docs worker is based at Gosford and see's to it that children and their parents are never reunited, in fact her and her colleagues will use their crown solicitor and your tax payers dollars to argue away your basic human rights.  Don't you Lindsay?

Michelle England, fantastic crown solicitor, atrocious child protection solicitor, successfully argued in court a few months ago that a grandmother was not an appropriate person to be having contact with her grandson because she exercised her article 19 rights under the convention of civil and political rights to freedom of expression.  Lindsay doesn't like how people gather at AltNews and Alecomm for support in this downtrodden child trafficking system and took the rights of the boy to have regular contact with his grandmother and now gives the grandmother 3 visits of 1 hour per year.

Subcategories