Wow. The media certainly didn't do any research before publishing this article. How disappointing. If you had the cohuna's you'd do some and then retract all the wording such as criminal syndicate - and go after the courts and the paedophiles that are running rampant particularly in Brisbane Magistrates Court building.
What a bunch of lying criminal poofters. The only people trafficking children are the federal courts, specifically Federal Magistrates like Jarrett and Coker, the criminal children’s representatives (traffickers) and the all-paedophile supporting court psychologists.
See the letter below written by Dr Russell Pridgeon, which explains in graphic, accurate detail WHY children in Australia remain unprotected against sexual abuse. I will be there are a few things regarding this issue that you did not know. Read and be APPALLED!!!
The Court hearing for Russell and Patrick ODea is tabled for this Friday at the Brisbane magistrates Court.
PLEASE, EVERYONE IN BRISBANE WHO CARES ABOUT PROTECTING CHILDREN, AND WOULD LIKE TO SEE AN END TO THE TERROR VISITED UPON HUNDREDS OF AUSTRALIAN KIDS, BE THERE.
Written by Dr Russell Pridgeon - Family Court Hero
It would be normal to think of people who rescue children from ongoing child sexual abuse, where there is a great cost to themselves, as decent, upstanding people, worthy of praise. In Australia, such is the official culture of tolerating child rape, those people who try to protect children from abuse are harassed, intimidated, arrested, prosecuted and jailed.
Child protectors and their organisations are being bullied, hamstrung and dismantled: only paedophiles could possibly benefit from these actions: this is a very dark moment in the history of the Australian Federal Police.
At every level, child sexual abuse is minimised, denied, covered up and the processes of law that should protect children are subverted and corrupted. Those who are paid to protect children use any excuse not to act.
The creation of a chimeric SARS-like virus has scientists discussing the risks of gain-of-function research.
Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team’s efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team’s results, which were published in Nature Medicine.
The results demonstrate the ability of the SHC014 surface protein to bind and infect human cells, validating concerns that this virus—or other coronaviruses found in bat species—may be capable of making the leap to people without first evolving in an intermediate host, Nature reported. They also reignite a debate about whether that information justifies the risk of such work, known as gain-of-function research. “If the [new] virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,” Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, told Nature.
This is the first letter in a long chain of correspondence between Dr Pridgeon and the Queensland Minister of Child Safety, while he was desperately trying to rescue these children from the custody of their abusive father.
This letter has been widely cc’d to any person who may have been in a position to help these children: THEY ALL KNEW BUT NOBODY DID ANYTHING.
Minister Farmer’s sole response was to block Dr Pridgeon’s emails.
A commonly heard response was: “why didn’t you just go the Police/Child Protection/the courts?”. The answer is: because they use any excuse NOT TO ACT.
Criminal lawyers will tell you, in unguarded moments, that in practical terms, incestuous child sexual abuse is no longer a crime. Considering the terrible life long consequences for the abused child, this statement seems appalling, but a moments reflection will create realisation that it is a realistic and true statement: it is a nearly impossible task to prosecute the perpetrator of incestuous sexual abuse in Australia.
Contrary to the untrue claims the paedophile-parent made about his former wife (the protective parent), she was an accomplished business-woman, an active community worker and a loving mother. This protective mother :
received the Prime Minister’s award for service to the community;
was a professional businesswoman who owned a multi-disciplinary paediatric allied health practice;
was recognised with a Rotary Club Paul Harris Fellowship; and,
kept her and her children’s abuse by her husband private.
There’s much more to this case, in fact the persecution of this mother is a huge slap in the face by all those involved in the recent apology to those who were beaten, raped and sodomised whilst under the care of previous governments.
So before you make judgements or are gullible enough to believe the disproven claims that many mothers make false child sexual abuse claims to obtain “an advantage” in family court, think again. There was no criminal syndicate abducting children, the criminal syndicate is the system that send children to live with their identified abuser. That this is a VERY common occurrence and that there is a tonne of case law judgements backing this up.
Background: A definitive treatment of SARS CoV-2 is yet to arrive and the human death toll rises exponentially globally. In this health emergency, it might be useful to look into the old therapies which could be effective against the virus. In vitro research showed Ivermectin could decrease the concentration of coronavirus 4000 to 5000 folds in living lung tissue.
Aim: In this prospective study a combination of Ivermectin and Doxycycline will be evaluated therapeutically to treat COVID-19 patients. Methods: 100 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in this study with a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RT- PCR of the SERS-CoV-2 will be done at designated government hospitals. The clinical features and response to treatment were noted according to a dedicated protocol.
Results: In this study male and female were 64 and 36 respectively, the age ranged between 8 to 84 years. Retesting was done between 4 and 18 days of starting medication. All patients tested negative and their symptoms improved within 72 hours. There were no noticeable side effects.
Isn't it a shame that mainstream media (so-called) journalists that followed suit like a bunch of lackeys, when they all jumped on the "criminal syndicate kidnapping children" bandwagon instead of doing their own homework.
Here's a few points to mull over whilst the real story gets hidden.
Pensioners and professionals are believed to be part of the syndicate, which allegedly used encrypted messages in order to avoid detection. "Syndicate"? Really? If the family court sent your children to live with or have unsupervised access with a paedophile, what would you do to help them? Any decent human being would help. Criminalising the good guys and covering for the real criminals is such a gutless act.
If mainstream media weren't so pathetic, they would do the research the staff at Alecomm have and discover, that the Australian Government and Family Law Courts routinely give paedphiles and convicted sex offenders access to their child-victims.
Pridgeon - who was arrested at his home in Grafton, New South Wales on Wednesday - is a GP and founded the Australian Antipaedophile Party.
He allegedly used Commonwealth money to create a network of 40 people which were part of the operation.Police allege O'Dea, who was also arrested on Wednesday, was given the job of driving around Australia for days at a time to pick up women and their children.
O'Dea - who once served in the Rhodesian army - allegedly stalked and threatened a father who eventually had his children returned to him years after they were taken.
It is alleged Pridgeon ran a Facebook page where women would send messages asking to escape from men they claimed to be paedophiles. Surely the mainstream media is aware that one in four girls is sexually assaulted by the time they are sixteen. The figures aren't much different for boys. Given that 24% of abuse cases in the family court are allegations of sexual assault, I'd say the figures match the statistics - meaning it isn't possible that all these women are lying and or jilted. What it does mean is that everytime a magistrate calls a protective mother a liar in the federal and family courts, and given the statistics of probability, he/she is potentially sending a child to live with their rapist.
If that's not bad enough, please read this long list of family court judgements that gives children either full custody to the child-raping parent or overnight-unsupervised access.
To give you a peek into what's in there we will start with Justice Carmody, who in the case of Murphy vs Murphy, stated :
“There is no presumption or a priori rule that even gross misbehaviour such as child sexual abuse or family violence disqualifies the offending parent or puts up an insurmountable barrier in the way of having contact with a child victim”.
He also either ignorantly, incompetely or deliberately stated : "
“There is no presumption or a priori rule that even gross misbehaviour such as child sexual abuse or family violence disqualifies the offending parent or puts up an insurmountable barrier in the way of having contact with a child victim”.
It's a shame that mainstream medias’ (so-called) journalists followed suit like a bunch of lackeys, when they all jumped on the "criminal syndicate kidnapping children" bandwagon - instead of doing their own homework.
Though we are sick of hearing both women and men actually believing the rubbish mainstream media dribbles, it is a tad frustrating when people aren't smart enough to consider for one moment that what they're being told is a blatant lie, or refuse to budge from their perception of "it's another nasty woman getting back at her ex-husband".
If anybody doubts that the truth of the assertion that incestuous child sexual abuse is no longer considered to be a crime in Australia they might review the complete disregard for the torrent of correspondence by numerous persons, including Dr Pridgeon, to multiple persons who should have been able to intervene and did not do so.
It is a demonstrable fact that the AFP have deliberately lied about the children’s abuse, while protecting the abusers (and actually delivering the children to the abusive father) while intimidating, harassing, arresting and prosecuting Australians who have made it their lifes work to protect children.
Child protection advocates and organisations have been searched by large numbers of AFP, they have been hamstrung in their efforts to protect children, they are being shut down.
Children will not benefit from this: child rapists will.
Whilst the media is continually downplaying the side-effects of the clot-shot, authorities are claiming that myocarditis is extremely rate and seems to be more linked to young males.
However recent VAERS reports confirm that while young men are suffering vaccine-induced myocarditis as a side-effect from the jab, what they are not reporting on is the amount of middle-aged women who are coming down with myocarditis after the clot-shot.
The figures are staggering and it beggars belief that our government is either completely stupid or deliberately not informing women of the serious adverse events they may suffer as a result of being coerced/tricked into having this extremely unsafe gene-therapy being passed off as a "vaccine".
In fact, in most age ranges, the cases of vaccine induced myocarditis in women are up to 5 times higher than that being reported in men.
One has to wonder if there is a reason that this information is not only being withheld from dissemination, but why not one female expert on covid vaccines - and there's a heck of a lot of them today, are standing up and calling this out. It's serious and needs to be brought to the attention of those pushing the clot-shot.
During his frantic attempts to rescue innocent children from the custody of their paedophile father, the person whom the children identified as their abuser, Dr Pridgeon wrote to anyone who might be in a position of power to assist these children: Nobody did anything.
They all knew, but nobody did anything.
It is important to understand the new reality: in Australia, the de facto reality is that INCESTUOUS CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE IS NO LONGER A CRIME….
Written by Cathy Meyer - Huffington Post (Contributor)
Below are a few stats from a Pew Research Center analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) released in June of 2011.
Married Fathers:
According to the report, a married father spends on average 6.5 hours a week taking part in primary child care activities with his children. The married mother spends on average 12.9 hours. Since two-income households are now the norm, not the exception, the above information indicates that not only are mothers working, but they are also doing twice as much child care as fathers.
It only makes sense that mothers who have a closer bond due to the time spent caring for a child be the one more likely to retain primary custody after a divorce.